Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796537›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Anthelmintic drugs for treating worms in children: effects on growth and cognitive performance.

R Dickson, S Awasthi, C Demellweek, P Williamson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. The end of the wormwars?The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R DicksonResearch and Development Support Unit, School of Health Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK, L69 3BX. rdickson@liv.ac.uk
S Awasthi
C Demellweek
P Williamson
King George's Medical University · INMerseytravel · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelminth (worm) infections are widespread and are thought to contribute to poor nutritional status, anaemia, and impaired growth and learning in children.

objectivesTo summarise the effects of anthelmintic drug treatment in children in relation to their growth and cognitive performance. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and the reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of drug treatment compared with placebo or no drug treatment for intestinal helminths in children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN

resultsThirty trials involving more than 1500 children were included. There was potential for bias from inadequate concealment of allocation. Studies varied in relation to target groups, drugs administered and treatment regimens. Compared to placebo or no drug treatment, drug treatment for helminths was associated with some positive effects on change in weight, height and skinfold thickness. However there was significant heterogeneity between the results of the trials. There were some positive effects on mean weight change in the trials reporting this outcome; after a single dose (any anthelminth) the pooled estimate was 0.24 kg, (95% CI 0.15 to 0.32; fixed effects model assumed); and 0.38 kg (95% CI 0.00 to 0.77; random effects model assumed). Results from trials giving multiple doses showed mean weight change under one year of follow up of 0.10 kg (95% CI 0.04 to 0.17; fixed effects assumed); or 0.15 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.30; random effects assumed). At more than one year of follow up, mean weight change was 0.12 kg (95% CI -0.02 to 0.26; fixed effects assumed) and 0.43 (95% CI -0.61 to 1.47; random effects model assumed). Results from studies of cognitive performance were mixed and inconclusive. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is some limited evidence that routine treatment of children in areas where helminths are common has small effects on weight gain, but this is not consistent between trials. There is insufficient evidence to know whether this intervention improves cognitive performance. Our interpretation of these results is that the current public health programme investments in this intervention, based on the expectation that there will be an improvement in growth and learning, are not based on consistent or reliable evidence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnthelminticsChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCognitionGrowthHelminthiasisHumansIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticNutritional StatusAnthelmintics

Identifiers

PMID10796537
OpenAlexW1848764794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.