SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Hospital-at-home versus in-patient hospital care.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Oncologic Home-Hospitalization Delivers a High-Quality and Patient-Centered Alternative to Standard Ambulatory Care: Results of a Randomized-Controlled Equivalence Trial.JCO global oncology · 2021Trial
- Physicians and nurses experiences of providing care to patients within a mobile care unit - a qualitative interview study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Re-purposing of domestic steam disinfectors within the hospital-at-home setting.Infection, disease & health · 2021Article
- The design of the Dutch EASYcare study: a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of a problem-based community intervention model for frail elderly people [NCT00105378].BMC health services research · 2005Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of venous thromboembolic disease between outpatient and inpatient management.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital-at-home is defined as a service that provides active treatment by health care professionals, in the patient's home, of a condition that otherwise would require acute hospital in-patient care, always for a limited period. Hospital-at-home has become a popular response to the increasing demand for acute hospital beds.
objectivesTo assess the effects of hospital-at-home compared with in-patient hospital care for patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE to 1996, EMBASE to 1995, Cinahl to 1996, the Social Science Citation Index (1992 to 1995), EconLit (1969 to 1996), PsycLit (1987 to 1996), Sigle (1980 to 1995), the Medical Care supplement on economic literature (1979 to 1990), and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of hospital-at-home care compared with acute hospital in-patient care. The participants were patients aged 18 years and over. The outcomes were mortality, clinical complications, re-admissions, cost (to the patient and family, to general practice, to the hospital and to the community), hospital days saved from the provision of hospital-at-home, discharge destination from hospital-at-home, general and disease specific health status, functional status, psychological well-being, patient satisfaction, carer satisfaction, carer burden, and staff views (including the satisfaction of doctors working in primary care). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN
resultsFive studies were included involving 866 patients. All studies were small and lacked power. No statistically significant differences were detected for patient health outcomes. Patients discharged early from hospital to hospital-at-home following elective surgery expressed greater satisfaction with care than those who remained in hospital. Carers however expressed less satisfaction with hospital-at-home compared with hospital care. Only one trial formally tested for a difference in cost, with no statistically significant difference detected for overall health care costs. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to assess the effects of hospital-at-home on patient outcomes or the cost to the health service. Given the heterogeneity of what hospital-at-home encompasses and the uncertainty over its effects, future research should clearly specify the type of service being provided, both at home and at hospital, and the specific patient groups. Patient health outcomes, patient and carer satisfaction, and costs should be measured, and studies should include a formal, planned economic analysis. Studies should be large enough to detect important differences and to ensure generalisability of the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10796533What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.