SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Interventions to promote collaboration between nurses and doctors.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of an Intervention in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Care for Patients Requesting Same Day Consultations by Nurse Practitioner vs General Practitioners
Interprofessional Training in a Psychiatric Study Unit
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An overview of systematic reviews on the collaboration between physicians and nurses and the impact on patient outcomes: what can we learn in primary care?BMC family practice · 2017Pooled it
- Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of teamwork training interventions in medical student and resident education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2008Pooled it
- Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Trial
- Collaboration in nursing-home care: perspectives of care professionals - a qualitative study.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- The Case for Interprofessional Teaching in Graduate Medical Education.ATS scholar · 2022Article
- Inter-Sectoral Management of Suicidal Persons in Ghana: Tensions and Prospects.Community mental health journal · 2021Article
- Medical ward round competence in internal medicine - an interview study towards an interprofessional development of an Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA).BMC medical education · 2016Article
- Interprofessional peer-assisted learning as a low-threshold course for joint learning: Evaluation results of the interTUT Project.GMS journal for medical education · 2016Article
- Effectiveness of interprofessional education by on-field training for medical students, with a pre-post design.BMC medical education · 2015Article
- Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation.Implementation science : IS · 2014Article
- The impact of team science collaborations in health care: a synopsis and comment on "Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes".Translational behavioral medicine · 2012Article
- Evaluation of the impact of interdisciplinarity in cancer care.BMC health services research · 2011Article
- Relationships of the location and content of rounds to specialty, institution, patient-census, and team size.PloS one · 2010Article
- The Use of Research Evidence in Two International Organizations' Recommendations about Health Systems.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2009Article
- Modelling innovative interventions for optimising healthy lifestyle promotion in primary health care: "prescribe Vida Saludable" phase I research protocol.BMC health services research · 2009Article
- Fever, hyperglycaemia and swallowing dysfunction management in acute stroke: a cluster randomised controlled trial of knowledge transfer.Implementation science : IS · 2009Article
- An action research protocol to strengthen system-wide inter-professional learning and practice [LP0775514].BMC health services research · 2007Article
- Qualitative evaluation of a form for standardized information exchange between orthopedic surgeons and occupational physicians.BMC health services research · 2006Article
- Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews.Implementation science : IS · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLack of nurse-doctor collaboration contributes to problems in quality and efficiency of patient care.
objectivesTo assess the effects of interventions designed to improve nurse-doctor collaboration. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register and database of studies awaiting assessment, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, MEDLINE, and reference lists of articles up to the end of October 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series of interventions to improve collaboration between nursing and medical professionals sharing patient care in primary or hospital care settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer assessed the eligibility of potentially relevant studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies; a second reviewer undertook duplicate assessments on the eligibility of some articles and data abstraction on all included studies. MAIN
resultsTwo trials involving 1945 people were included. One six month trial involving 1102 admissions evaluated daily, structured, team ward rounds, in which nurses, doctors and other professionals made care decisions jointly. There was shortened average length of hospital stay (LOS) from 6.06 to 5.46 days, and reduced hospital charges from US$ 8090 to 6681. There were no differences in mortality rates or the type of care to which patients were discharged. Another three month trial involving 843 admissions compared two female wards and evaluated a four times per week round. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control wards in total average length of stay for all patients (11.7 days in intervention ward versus 11.6 in the control ward). Excluding patients who died in hospital revealed shortened length of stay in the intervention ward (intervention ward 10.5 days, control ward 11.9). Mortality rates were not significantly different. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIncreasing collaboration improved outcomes of importance to patients and to health care managers. These gains were moderate and affected health care processes rather than outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. The logistic challenge presented by the complexity of the interventions and the need for large sample sizes due to the likely modest impact and rarity of outcome events may best be met by multi-centre studies. Before launching such studies qualitative research is needed to identify barriers to collaboration. Interventions other than nurse-doctor ward rounds and team meetings should also be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10796485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.