Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796463›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome in full term infants.

R F Soll, P Dargaville

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Exogenous surfactant: intubated present, nebulized future?World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2011
    Review
  4. Review
  5. [Not Available].Paediatrics & child health · 2005
    Article
  6. Recommendations for neonatal surfactant therapy.Paediatrics & child health · 2005
    Article
  7. Medication Repurposing in Pediatric Patients: Teaching Old Drugs New Tricks.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R F SollDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, A-121 Medical Alumni Building, Burlington, Vermont 05405-0068, USA. rsoll@salus.med.uvm.edu
P Dargaville
Royal Hobart Hospital · AUUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effect of surfactant administration in the treatment of term infants with meconium aspiration syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made using Medline (1985 to January 2000) (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant and meconium aspiration; limits: age groups, newborns; publication type, clinical trials), previous reviews including cross-references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. Authors were directly contacted to provide additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which evaluated the effect of surfactant administration in term infants with meconium aspiration syndrome are included in the analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including duration of assisted ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage (any grade and severe IVH), chronic lung disease, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and mortality were excerpted from the reports of the clinical trails by the reviewers. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN

resultsTwo randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria. Findlay (1996) reports a decrease in the risk of pneumothorax (relative risk 0.09, 95% CI 0.01, 1.54, risk difference -0.25, 95% CI -0.45, -0.05). Both Findlay (1996) and Lotze (1998) report a decrease in the number of infants receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The meta-analysis supports a significant reduction in the risk of requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (typical relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.46, 0.91 typical risk difference -0.17, 95% CI -0.30, -0.04). No difference was noted in overall mortality (typical relative risk 1.86 95% CI 0.35, 9.89, typical risk difference 0.02 95% CI -0.03, 0.07). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsIn infants with meconium aspiration syndrome, surfactant administration may reduce the severity of respiratory illness and decrease the number of infants with progressive respiratory failure requiring support with ECMO. The relative efficacy of surfactant therapy compared to, or in conjunction with, other approaches to treatment including inhaled nitric oxide, liquid ventilation, and high frequency ventilation remains to be tested.

Indexed as

HumansInfant, NewbornMeconium Aspiration SyndromePulmonary SurfactantsPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID10796463
OpenAlexW1730075423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.