Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796456›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Vancomycin for prophylaxis against sepsis in preterm neonates.

A P Craft, N N Finer, K J Barrington

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotic regimens for suspected late onset sepsis in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  4. Vancomycin for prophylaxis against sepsis in preterm neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the Incidence of Sepsis Post-Central Catheter Removal When Using Prophylactic Vancomycin in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neonatal sepsis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2013
    Review
  10. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2011
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Early neutropenia is not associated with an increased rate of nosocomial infection in very low-birth-weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Catheter related bloodstream infection following PICC removal in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2007
    Article
  15. Prevention and treatment of nosocomial sepsis in the NICU.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2004
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. NEWER CONCEPTS AND MANAGEMENT OF NEONATAL SEPSIS.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2002
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Antibiotics Before Removal of Percutaneously Inserted Central Venous Catheters Reduces Clinical Sepsis in Premature Infants.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A P CraftPediatrics, University of California, San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, California 92103-8774, USA. nfiner@ucsd.edu
N N Finer
K J Barrington
University of California, San Diego · USRoyal Victoria Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNosocomial, late onset sepsis occurs in up to 50% of infants of less than 1000gm at birth. The commonest organism isolated is coagulase negative staphylococcus (CoNS). A number of studies have evaluated the efficacy or prophylactic low dose vancomycin given either as a continuous infusion added to the infant's hyperalimentation fluid or by intermittent intravenous administration and these studies in very low birth weight infants are the subject of this review.

objectivesTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin prophylaxis for the prevention of late-onset sepsis, coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis, mortality, and effects on length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the preterm neonate. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of Medline, (MeSH terms: Vancomycin and Sepsis; limits: age groups, newborn infants), HealthStar and EMBase, electronic abstracts, personal files and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials which compared the incidence of sepsis and mortality in preterm neonates receiving vancomycin prophylaxis versus a control group receiving no prophylaxis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including the overall incidence of sepsis, the incidence of coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis, mortality, length of stay, total vancomycin exposure, evidence of vancomycin toxicity, and the development of vancomycin resistant organisms were excerpted from previous clinical trials. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. MAIN

resultsThe administration of prophylactic vancomycin reduced the incidence of both total neonatal nosocomial sepsis and coagulase negative staphylococcal sepsis in eligible preterm infants. Mortality, length of stay, and evidence of vancomycin toxicity were not significantly different between the two groups. There was insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms in the nurseries involved in these trials. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe use of prophylactic vancomycin in low doses reduces the incidence of nosocomial sepsis in the neonate. The methodologies of these studies may have contributed to the low rate of sepsis in the treated groups, as the blood cultures drawn from central lines may have failed to grow due to the low levels of vancomycin in the infusate. Although there is a theoretical concern regarding the development of resistant organisms with the administration of prophylactic antibiotic, there is insufficient evidence to ascertain the risks of development of vancomycin resistant organisms. Few clinically important benefits have been demonstrated for very low birth weight infants treated with prophylactic vancomycin. It therefore appears that routine prophylaxis with vancomycin should not be undertaken at present.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCross InfectionHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesSepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID10796456
PMCPMC7017970
OpenAlexW2100320012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.