Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796411›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

C S Cina, C M Clase, R B Haynes

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Fibrinogen depleting agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Review
  12. The use of formal and informal knowledge sources in patients' treatment decisions in secondary stroke prevention: qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stroke management.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Safety of carotid stenting for stroke prevention: need of an independent outcome assessor.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2009
    Article
  20. Recurrent stroke: what have we learnt?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C S CinaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Victoria Medical Centre, Suite 305, 304 Victoria Avenue North, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 5G4. cinacs@fhs.csu.mcmaster.ca
C M Clase
R B Haynes
McMaster University · CAMcMaster University Medical Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere narrowing (or stenosis) of the carotid artery is an important cause of stroke. Surgical removal of the atheromatous material from the inside of the carotid artery (endarterectomy) may reduce the risk of stroke, but carries a risk of operative complications.

objectivesThis review seeks to summarize the evidence from randomized trials on the balance of risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in adults with symptomatic carotid stenosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group's Specialized Register of trials (date last searched: March 1999), supplemented by electronic searches of several databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing 'best medical treatment plus carotid endarterectomy' with 'best medical therapy' in patients with carotid stenosis and a recent transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling ischaemic stroke in the territory of that artery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. An intention to treat analysis was performed. MAIN

resultsData on death or disabling stroke were available from two trials, which included 5950 patients: the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). The two trials used different methods to measure stenosis, but a simple formula can be used to convert between the two methods. For patients with severe stenosis (ECST > 80% = NASCET > 70%), surgery reduced the relative risk of disabling stroke or death by 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27 - 73%). The number of patients needed to be operated on (number needed to treat [NNT]) to prevent one disabling stroke or death over 2 to 6 years follow-up was 15 (95% CI 10 - 31). For patients with less severe stenosis (ECST 70 - 79% = NASCET 50 - 69%), surgery reduced the relative risk of disabling stroke or death by 27% (95% CI 15 - 44%). The number of patients needed to be operated on to prevent one disabling stroke or death was 21 (95% CI 11 - 125). Patients with lesser degrees of stenosis were harmed by surgery. Surgery increased the risk of disabling stroke or death by 20% (95% CI 0 - 44%). The number of patients needed to be operated on to cause one disabling stroke or death was 45 (95% CI 22 - infinity). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsCarotid endarterectomy reduced the risk of disabling stroke or death for patients with stenosis exceeding ECST-measured 70% or NASCET-measured 50%. This result is generalizable only to surgically-fit patients operated on by surgeons with low complication rates (less than 6%).

Indexed as

Endarterectomy, CarotidAdultCarotid StenosisHumansRisk

Identifiers

PMID10796411
OpenAlexW1500364488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.