SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Fibrinogen depleting agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Short term and intermediate term comparison of endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid artery stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Pooled it
- Carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis in patients selected for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- [European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack : part 2].Der Nervenarzt · 2008Guideline
- Antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke and other vascular events after carotid endarterectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Pooled it
- SLC4A10 impedes atherosclerosis by diminishing IFN-γ/GZMB levels of CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Contribution of UltraFast™ Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography in the Imaging of Carotid Artery Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Prevalence and correlates of carotid artery stenosis in a cohort of Sri Lankan ischaemic stroke patients.BMC neurology · 2021Article
- Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Review
- The use of formal and informal knowledge sources in patients' treatment decisions in secondary stroke prevention: qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013Article
- [Extracranial carotid stenosis: diagnostics, therapy and follow-up].Der Radiologe · 2013Review
- Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) knowledge in general practice: a cross-sectional study of Western Adelaide general practitioners.BMC research notes · 2012Article
- Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of matrix metalloproteinase activity in vulnerable human carotid plaques.Molecular imaging and biology · 2012Article
- Asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis: an obsolete classification?Stroke research and treatment · 2012Article
- Stroke management.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2011Article
- Carotid artery stenting, endarterectomy, or medical treatment alone: the debate is not over.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2011Article
- Safety of carotid stenting for stroke prevention: need of an independent outcome assessor.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2009Article
- Recurrent stroke: what have we learnt?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere narrowing (or stenosis) of the carotid artery is an important cause of stroke. Surgical removal of the atheromatous material from the inside of the carotid artery (endarterectomy) may reduce the risk of stroke, but carries a risk of operative complications.
objectivesThis review seeks to summarize the evidence from randomized trials on the balance of risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in adults with symptomatic carotid stenosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group's Specialized Register of trials (date last searched: March 1999), supplemented by electronic searches of several databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing 'best medical treatment plus carotid endarterectomy' with 'best medical therapy' in patients with carotid stenosis and a recent transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling ischaemic stroke in the territory of that artery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. An intention to treat analysis was performed. MAIN
resultsData on death or disabling stroke were available from two trials, which included 5950 patients: the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). The two trials used different methods to measure stenosis, but a simple formula can be used to convert between the two methods. For patients with severe stenosis (ECST > 80% = NASCET > 70%), surgery reduced the relative risk of disabling stroke or death by 48% (95% confidence interval [CI] 27 - 73%). The number of patients needed to be operated on (number needed to treat [NNT]) to prevent one disabling stroke or death over 2 to 6 years follow-up was 15 (95% CI 10 - 31). For patients with less severe stenosis (ECST 70 - 79% = NASCET 50 - 69%), surgery reduced the relative risk of disabling stroke or death by 27% (95% CI 15 - 44%). The number of patients needed to be operated on to prevent one disabling stroke or death was 21 (95% CI 11 - 125). Patients with lesser degrees of stenosis were harmed by surgery. Surgery increased the risk of disabling stroke or death by 20% (95% CI 0 - 44%). The number of patients needed to be operated on to cause one disabling stroke or death was 45 (95% CI 22 - infinity). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsCarotid endarterectomy reduced the risk of disabling stroke or death for patients with stenosis exceeding ECST-measured 70% or NASCET-measured 50%. This result is generalizable only to surgically-fit patients operated on by surgeons with low complication rates (less than 6%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.