Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796382›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

F Crawley, M M Brown

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F CrawleyInstitute of Neurology, The National Hospital, Queen Square, London, UK, WC1N 3BG. m.brown@ion.ucl.ac.uk
M M Brown
National Hospital · INUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty may be a useful non-surgical procedure for carotid stenosis, particularly for lesions not suitable for surgery.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty compared with carotid endarterectomy (in patients suitable for surgery) or medical therapy (in patients not suitable for surgery). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Groups trials register (to August 1997). We contacted researchers in the field and balloon catheter manufacturers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (with or without stenting) compared with carotid endarterectomy, or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty plus best medical therapy compared with best medical therapy alone, in people with carotid artery stenosis (symptomatic or asymptomatic). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria. MAIN

resultsNo completed trials were found. Two trials are underway. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is no evidence as yet to assess the relative effects of carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in people with carotid stenosis.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonStentsCarotid StenosisHumans

Identifiers

PMID10796382
OpenAlexW4242071069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.