Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796345›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Conservative versus operative treatment for extracapsular hip fractures.

M J Parker, H H Handoll

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conservative versus operative treatment for hip fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mortality following hip fracture surgery in patients with recent myocardial infarction.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2007
    Article
  8. Extracts from "clinical evidence": hip fracture.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M J ParkerOrthopaedic Department, Peterborough District Hospital, Thorpe Road, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK, PE3 6DA. mjparker@globalnet.co.uk
H H Handoll
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBPeterborough City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUntil operative treatment involving the use of various implants was introduced in the 1950s, hip fractures were managed using conservative methods based on traction and bed rest.

objectivesTo compare conservative with operative treatment for extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur (hip) in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register and bibliographies of published papers, and contacted trialists. Date of the most recent search: August 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing these two treatment methods in adults with hip fracture. Outcomes sought fell into four categories: a) fracture fixation complications, b) post-operative or clinical complications, c) final outcome measures including mortality and d) anatomical restoration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently assessed trial quality, by use of an eleven item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from trialists. Comparable groups of trials were subgrouped by implant type (fixed nail plate or sliding hip screw) and where appropriate, data were pooled using the fixed effects model. MAIN

resultsThe four randomised trials identified involved only 402 elderly patients. These tested a variety of surgical techniques and implant devices and only one trial involving 106 patients can be considered to test current practice. In this trial, no differences were found in medical complications, mortality and long-term pain. However, operative treatment was more likely to result in the fracture healing without leg shortening, a shorter hospital stay and a statistically non-significant increase in the return of patients back to their original residence. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe limited available evidence from randomised trials does not suggest major differences in outcome between conservative and operative management programmes for extracapsular femoral fractures, but operative treatment appears to be associated with a reduced length of hospital stay and improved rehabilitation. However these results are derived mainly from one study. Conservative treatment will be acceptable where modern surgical facilities are unavailable, and will result in a reduction in complications associated with surgery, but rehabilitation is likely to be slower and limb deformity more common. Although further randomised trials would provide more robust data, they may be difficult to mount.

Indexed as

AdultHip FracturesHumansOrthopedic Procedures

Identifiers

PMID10796345
OpenAlexW1565161438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.