SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Interventions for dysphagia in acute stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Do stroke clinical practice guideline recommendations for the intervention of thickened liquids for aspiration support evidence based decision making? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2020Pooled it
- Swallowing therapy for dysphagia in acute and subacute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Treatment for dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) in hereditary ataxia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric feeding in older individuals with non-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2015Pooled it
- Effects of therapy in oropharyngeal dysphagia by speech and language therapists: a systematic review.Dysphagia · 2010Pooled it
- Study design for the fostering eating after stroke with transcranial direct current stimulation trial: a randomized controlled intervention for improving Dysphagia after acute ischemic stroke.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2015Trial
- Trial
- The Impact of Nutritional Therapy on Gastrointestinal Motility in Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Factors Contributing to Complete Oral Intake in Dysphagic Stroke Patients with Enteral Feeding Tubes in Convalescent Rehabilitation Wards.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2023Article
- Laryngeal and swallow dysregulation following acute cervical spinal cord injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Manual Acupuncture or Combination of Rehabilitation Therapy to Treat Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Reduces Aspiration Pneumonia Rate in Stroke Patients with Enteral Feeding in Convalescent Rehabilitation Wards.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Swallowing Status Comparison between Primary Dysphagia and Post-stroke Dysphagia in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities.Swallowing rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Race, Socioeconomic Status, and Gastrostomy after Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2020Observational
- Acupuncture for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Pilot, Nonrandomized, Self-Controlled Trial.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
- Effects of Motor Imagery and Visual Neurofeedback on Activation in the Swallowing Network: A Real-Time fMRI Study.Dysphagia · 2019Article
- Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Reverses the After-Effects of Contralateral Virtual Lesion on the Suprahyoid Muscle Cortex: Evidence From Dynamic Functional Connectivity Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- The After-Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation Over the Cortex of the Suprahyoid Muscle on Regional Homogeneity in Healthy Subjects.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is unclear how dysphagic patients should be fed and treated after acute stroke.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of different management strategies for dysphagic stroke patients, in particular how and when to feed, whether to supplement nutritional intake, and how and whether to treat dysphagia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Medline, Embase, ISI, and existing review articles. We contacted researchers in the field and equipment manufacturers. Date of the most recent searches: March 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded truly or quasi randomised controlled trials in dysphagic patients with acute/subacute (within 3 months) stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently applied the trial inclusion criteria. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) versus nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding: two trials (49 patients) suggest that PEG reduces end-of-trial case fatality (Peto Odds Ratio, OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.89) and treatment failures (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.52), and improves nutritional status, assessed as weight (Weighted Men Difference, WMD +4.1 kg, 95% CI -4.3 to +12.5), mid-arm circumference (WMD +2.2 cm, 95% CI -0.5 to +4.9) or serum albumin (WMD + 7.0 g/l, 95% CI +4.9 to +9.1) as compared with NGT feeding; two larger studies are ongoing. Timing of feeding: no completed trials; one large study is ongoing. Swallowing therapy for dysphagia: two trials (85 patients) suggest that formal swallowing therapy does not significantly reduce end-of-trial dysphagia rates (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.66). Drug therapy for dysphagia: one trial (17 patients); nifedipine did not alter end-of-trial case fatality or the frequency of dysphagia. Nutritional supplementation: one trial (42 patients) found a non-significant trend to a lower case fatality, and significantly increased energy and protein intake; one large trial is ongoing and data is awaited from two other studies. Fluid supplementation: one trial (20 patients) found that supplementation did not alter the time to resolution of dysphagia. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsToo few studies have been performed, and these have involved too few patients. PEG feeding may improve outcome and nutrition as compared with NGT feeding. Further research is required to assess how and when patients are fed, and the effect of swallowing or drug therapy on dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.