Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796336›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Community mental health teams (CMHTs) for people with severe mental illnesses and disordered personality.

P Tyrer, J Coid, S Simmonds, P Joseph, S Marriott

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Successful participation of patients in interprofessional team meetings: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  8. Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mental illness in my backyard.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P TyrerPaterson Centre, 20 South Wharf Road, Paddington, London, UK, W2 1PD. p.tyrer@ic.ac.uk
J Coid
S Simmonds
P Joseph
S Marriott
Centre for Mental Health · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBSt Charles Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClosure of asylums and institutions for the mentally ill, coupled with government policies focusing on reducing the number of hospital beds for people with severe mental illness in favour of providing care in a variety of non-hospital settings underpins the rationale behind care in the community. A major thrust towards community care has been the development of community mental health teams (CMHT).

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of community mental health team (CMHT) treatment for anyone with serious mental illness. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1982-1997), the Cochrane Library (1998, Issue 2), EMBASE (1980-1997), MEDLINE (1966-1997), PsycLIT (1974-1997) and SCISEARCH (1997) were undertaken. The Journal of Personality Disorders was hand searched, and contact was made with colleagues at ENMESH, ISSPD and in forensic psychiatry. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of CMHT management versus non-team standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The selection of trials, assessment of quality and data extraction was undertaken independently and in parallel by two reviewers. Where possible the data were entered into RevMan and an intention-to-treat analysis undertaken. Tests of heterogeneity were undertaken. MAIN

resultsCMHT management may be associated with fewer deaths by suicide and in suspicious circumstances (OR 0.32 CI 0.09-1.12). It causes less people to be dissatisfied with their care (OR 0.34 CI 0.2-0.59) and to leave the studies early (OR 0.61 CI 0.45-0.83). No clear difference was found in admission rates, overall clinical outcomes and duration of in-patient hospital treatment, although this was partly a consequence of poorly presented data. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsCommunity mental health team management is not inferior to non-team standard care in any important respects and is superior in promoting greater acceptance of treatment. It may also be superior in reducing hospital admission and avoiding death by suicide.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesPatient Care TeamHumansMental DisordersPersonality Disorders

Identifiers

PMID10796336
OpenAlexW4240939188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.