SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06672757 (Use of App for Stroke Assessment VS Standard Level of Care During Prehospital Stroke Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of App for Stroke Assessment VS Standard Level of Care During Prehospital Stroke Assessment
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and safety of ShenXiong glucose injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and GRADE approach.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Towards the identification of blood biomarkers for acute stroke in humans: a comprehensive systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Pooled it
- Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Efficacy of argatroban plus alteplase versus intravenous alteplase according to diabetes mellitus in acute ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Combined intravenous and intraarterial revascularization therapy using MRI perfusion/diffusion mismatch selection for acute ischemic stroke at 3-6 h after symptom onset.Neurocritical care · 2008Trial
- Haemorrhage after thrombectomy with adjuvant thrombolysis in unknown onset stroke depends on high early lesion water uptake.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2024Article
- A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of emergency interventions for stroke in low- and middle-income countries.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2020Review
- Proposed antithrombotic strategy for acute ischemic stroke with large-artery atherosclerosis: focus on patients with high-risk transient ischemic attack and mild-to-moderate stroke.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Comparison of neurological clinical manifestation in patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke.World journal of emergency medicine · 2017Article
- Retrosternal mass: An interesting allergic reaction to intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke.Iranian journal of neurology · 2013Article
- [Thrombolysis for ischemic stroke: an update].Der Nervenarzt · 2007Review
- New treatments in acute ischemic stroke.Current treatment options in neurology · 2005Article
- Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2005Article
- Therapeutic time window of thrombolytic therapy following stroke.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2004Review
- Stroke, dementia, and drug delivery.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004Review
- Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2003Review
- New magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography techniques for imaging of acute stroke.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2003Review
- Therapeutic thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of strokes are due to blockage of an artery in the brain by a blood clot. Clot dissolving (or thrombolytic) drugs may reduce brain damage from the stroke, but may also cause serious bleeding in the brain. Thrombolytic therapy has now been evaluated in several randomised trials in acute ischaemic stroke.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic agents in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Stroke Review Group search strategy plus ongoing contact with researchers and pharmaceutical companies. Last search conducted March 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of any thrombolytic agent compared with control in patients with definite ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer applied the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. Trial quality was assessed. The extracted data were verified by the principal investigators of all major trials. MAIN
resultsSeventeen trials including 5216 patients were included. Fifteen trials were double-blind. The trials tested urokinase, streptokinase, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator or recombinant pro-urokinase. Two trials used intra-arterial administration but the rest used the intravenous route. About 50% of the data come from trials testing intravenous tissue Plasminogen Activator. Thrombolytic therapy significantly increased the odds of death within the first ten days (odds ratio [OR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 2.32). The main cause of the increase in deaths was fatal intracranial haemorrhage following thrombolysis (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.96 to 5.84). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage is also increased following thrombolysis (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.79 to 4.45). Thrombolytic therapy also increased the odds of death at the end of follow-up (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1. 52). Despite this, thrombolytic therapy, administered up to six hours after ischaemic stroke, significantly reduced the proportion of patients who were dead or dependent (modified Rankin 3 to 6) at the end of follow-up (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94). For patients treated within three hours of stroke, thrombolytic therapy appeared more effective in reducing death or dependency (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74) with less adverse effect on death (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.47). There was heterogeneity between the trials that could have been due to : thrombolytic drug used, variation in the concomitant use of aspirin and heparin, severity of the stroke, and time to treatment. Trials testing intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator suggest that it may be associated with slightly less hazard and more benefit when given up to six hours after stroke - death within the first ten days OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.81, death at the end of follow-up OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44, dead or dependent at the end of follow-up OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92. One trial that tested thrombolysis plus aspirin showed an increase in deaths of patients given both drugs in combination compared with thrombolysis alone. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThrombolytic therapy increases deaths within the first seven to ten days, and deaths at final follow-up. Thrombolytic therapy also significantly increases symptomatic and fatal intracranial haemorrhage. These risks are offset by a reduction in disability in survivors, so that there is, overall, a significant net reduction in the proportion of patients dead or dependent in activities of daily living. The data from trials using intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator, from which there is the most evidence on thrombolytic therapy so far, suggest that it may be associated with less hazard and more benefit. There was heterogeneity between the trials and the optimum criteria to identify the patients most likely to benefit and least likely to be harmed, the agent, dose, and route of administration, are not clear. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.