Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796329›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.

J M Wardlaw, G del Zoppo, T Yamaguchi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06672757 (Use of App for Stroke Assessment VS Standard Level of Care During Prehospital Stroke Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06672757 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Use of App for Stroke Assessment VS Standard Level of Care During Prehospital Stroke Assessment

TypeinterventionalSponsorNaestved HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled1,200ConditionsStroke, AcuteArmsCV_AID
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  5. Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of emergency interventions for stroke in low- and middle-income countries.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. New treatments in acute ischemic stroke.Current treatment options in neurology · 2005
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Stroke, dementia, and drug delivery.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Therapeutic thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J M WardlawNeurosciences Trials Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, UK, EH4 2XU. jmw@skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk
G del Zoppo
T Yamaguchi
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPScripps Research Institute · USWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of strokes are due to blockage of an artery in the brain by a blood clot. Clot dissolving (or thrombolytic) drugs may reduce brain damage from the stroke, but may also cause serious bleeding in the brain. Thrombolytic therapy has now been evaluated in several randomised trials in acute ischaemic stroke.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic agents in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane Stroke Review Group search strategy plus ongoing contact with researchers and pharmaceutical companies. Last search conducted March 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of any thrombolytic agent compared with control in patients with definite ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer applied the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. Trial quality was assessed. The extracted data were verified by the principal investigators of all major trials. MAIN

resultsSeventeen trials including 5216 patients were included. Fifteen trials were double-blind. The trials tested urokinase, streptokinase, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator or recombinant pro-urokinase. Two trials used intra-arterial administration but the rest used the intravenous route. About 50% of the data come from trials testing intravenous tissue Plasminogen Activator. Thrombolytic therapy significantly increased the odds of death within the first ten days (odds ratio [OR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 2.32). The main cause of the increase in deaths was fatal intracranial haemorrhage following thrombolysis (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.96 to 5.84). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage is also increased following thrombolysis (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.79 to 4.45). Thrombolytic therapy also increased the odds of death at the end of follow-up (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1. 52). Despite this, thrombolytic therapy, administered up to six hours after ischaemic stroke, significantly reduced the proportion of patients who were dead or dependent (modified Rankin 3 to 6) at the end of follow-up (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94). For patients treated within three hours of stroke, thrombolytic therapy appeared more effective in reducing death or dependency (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74) with less adverse effect on death (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.47). There was heterogeneity between the trials that could have been due to : thrombolytic drug used, variation in the concomitant use of aspirin and heparin, severity of the stroke, and time to treatment. Trials testing intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator suggest that it may be associated with slightly less hazard and more benefit when given up to six hours after stroke - death within the first ten days OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.81, death at the end of follow-up OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.44, dead or dependent at the end of follow-up OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.92. One trial that tested thrombolysis plus aspirin showed an increase in deaths of patients given both drugs in combination compared with thrombolysis alone. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThrombolytic therapy increases deaths within the first seven to ten days, and deaths at final follow-up. Thrombolytic therapy also significantly increases symptomatic and fatal intracranial haemorrhage. These risks are offset by a reduction in disability in survivors, so that there is, overall, a significant net reduction in the proportion of patients dead or dependent in activities of daily living. The data from trials using intravenous recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator, from which there is the most evidence on thrombolytic therapy so far, suggest that it may be associated with less hazard and more benefit. There was heterogeneity between the trials and the optimum criteria to identify the patients most likely to benefit and least likely to be harmed, the agent, dose, and route of administration, are not clear. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Indexed as

Thrombolytic TherapyBrain IschemiaFibrinolytic AgentsHumansStrokeFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID10796329
OpenAlexW4211005142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.