Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796318›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.

Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. In-hospital care pathways for stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comprehensive stroke centers and the 'weekend effect': the SPOTRIAS experience.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Quality measures in stroke.The Neurohospitalist · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stroke Unit Trialists' CollaborationAcademic Section of Geriatric Medicine, 3rd Floor, Centre Block, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK, G4 0SF. p.langhorne@clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecially organised stroke units can be a ward or team that exclusively manages stroke patients (a dedicated stroke unit) or a ward or team that provides a generic disability service (a mixed assessment or rehabilitation unit).

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of care in a stroke unit compared with conventional care of patients following a stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, reference lists of articles and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing organised inpatient stroke unit care with conventional care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and trial quality. The principal reviewer conducted a structured interview with the coordinators of unpublished trials. MAIN

resultsTwenty trials were included. Stroke unit care showed a reduction in the odds of death recorded at final follow-up (median one year). The odds ratio was 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.97. The odds of death or institutionalised care were lower (0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.90) as were death or dependency at final review (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.87). Subgroup analyses showed that the observed benefits were independent of patient age, sex, stroke severity, and types of stroke unit organisation. There was no indication that organised stroke unit care resulted in increased hospital stay, although there was heterogeneity between the trials. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsStroke patients who receive organised inpatient care in a stroke unit are more likely to be alive, independent, and living at home one year after the stroke. The apparent benefits are not restricted to any particular sub-group of patients or model of stroke unit care. No systematic increase was observed in the length of inpatient stay.

Indexed as

Hospital UnitsPatient Care TeamHumansStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.