SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of acute stroke unit care: what's beyond the statistical significance?BMC medical research methodology · 2013Pooled it
- Guideline
- Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Occupational therapy for patients with problems in activities of daily living after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- [The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].Der Anaesthesist · 2006Guideline
- Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- In-hospital care pathways for stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Trial
- The role of physiotherapists in acute post-stroke neurorehabilitation: qualitative perspectives from clinicians and stroke unit managers.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Short-Term Effects of Focal Muscle Vibration on Motor Recovery After Acute Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Article
- Preferred rehabilitation setting among stroke survivors in Nigeria and associated personal factors.African journal of disability · 2018Article
- Main barriers to effective implementation of stroke care pathways in France: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Off-hour effect on 3-month functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a prospective multicenter registry.PloS one · 2014Article
- Review of stroke center effectiveness and other get with the guidelines data.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2013Review
- Article
- Primary stroke center concept: strengths and limitations.Frontiers in neurology · 2012Article
- Comprehensive stroke centers and the 'weekend effect': the SPOTRIAS experience.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2012Article
- Disparities in postacute rehabilitation care for stroke: an analysis of the state inpatient databases.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2011Article
- Quality measures in stroke.The Neurohospitalist · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecially organised stroke units can be a ward or team that exclusively manages stroke patients (a dedicated stroke unit) or a ward or team that provides a generic disability service (a mixed assessment or rehabilitation unit).
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of care in a stroke unit compared with conventional care of patients following a stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, reference lists of articles and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing organised inpatient stroke unit care with conventional care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and trial quality. The principal reviewer conducted a structured interview with the coordinators of unpublished trials. MAIN
resultsTwenty trials were included. Stroke unit care showed a reduction in the odds of death recorded at final follow-up (median one year). The odds ratio was 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.97. The odds of death or institutionalised care were lower (0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.90) as were death or dependency at final review (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.87). Subgroup analyses showed that the observed benefits were independent of patient age, sex, stroke severity, and types of stroke unit organisation. There was no indication that organised stroke unit care resulted in increased hospital stay, although there was heterogeneity between the trials. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsStroke patients who receive organised inpatient care in a stroke unit are more likely to be alive, independent, and living at home one year after the stroke. The apparent benefits are not restricted to any particular sub-group of patients or model of stroke unit care. No systematic increase was observed in the length of inpatient stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10796318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.