SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Effect of patching on reducing restenosis in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.Stroke · 2015Trial
- Randomized trial comparing Quixil surgical sealant with Kaltostat hemostatic dressing to control suture line bleeding after carotid endarterectomy with ePTFE patch reconstruction.World journal of surgery · 2005Trial
- Article
- A regional quality improvement effort to increase beta blocker administration before vascular surgery.Journal of vascular surgery · 2011Article
- Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects.Journal of vascular surgery · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarotid patch angioplasty (with either a venous or a synthetic patch) may reduce the risk of carotid artery restenosis and subsequent ischaemic stroke.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of routine or selective carotid patch angioplasty compared to carotid endarterectomy with primary closure. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Medline (1966 to 1995), Embase (1980 to 1995) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). We handsearched Annals of Surgery (1981 to 1995), British Journal of Surgery (1985 to 1995), European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (1987 to 1995) and World Journal of Surgery (1978 to 1995). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing carotid patch angioplasty with primary closure in any patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsSix trials involving 794 patients and 882 operations were included. The quality of trials was generally poor. Follow-up varied from hospital discharge to five years. Carotid patch angioplasty showed a reduction in the risk of stroke of any type, ipsilateral stroke, and stroke or death, during the perioperative period and longterm follow-up. However, data were not available from all trials, the number of events was small and there was significant loss to follow-up. Patching appeared to reduce the risk of perioperative arterial occlusion (six trials, odds ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.46). Patching was also associated with decreased restenosis during longterm follow-up in five trials, (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.53). However, these results are uncertain because of loss to follow-up and the small number of events. Very few arterial complications, including haemorrhage, infection, cranial nerve palsies and pseudo-aneurysm formation were recorded with either patch or primary closure. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsLimited evidence suggests that carotid patch angioplasty may lower the risk of perioperative arterial occlusion and restenosis. It is unclear whether this reduces the risk of death or stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.