SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Multiple versus single dose natural surfactant extract for severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surfactant for bacterial pneumonia in late preterm and term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Multiple versus single doses of exogenous surfactant for the prevention or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Article
- Comparative effectiveness of surfactant preparations in premature infants.The Journal of pediatrics · 2013Article
- Surfactants: past, present and future.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008Review
- What's new in surfactant? A clinical view on recent developments in neonatology and paediatrics.European journal of pediatrics · 2007Review
- Overview of surfactant replacement trials.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2005Review
- [Not Available].Paediatrics & child health · 2005Article
- Recommendations for neonatal surfactant therapy.Paediatrics & child health · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.
objectivesTo compare the effect of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract to single doses of natural surfactant extract in premature infants with established respiratory distress syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups, newborn infant; publication type, clinical trials), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing a policy of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract to a policy of single doses of natural surfactant extract in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on clinical outcomes including pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (all intraventricular hemorrhage and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality were excerpted by the primary reviewer (R. Soll). Data were analyzed according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. MAIN
resultsTwo randomized controlled trials of multiple vs. single dose natural surfactant extract in infants with established respiratory distress syndrome were identified. Meta-analysis of these trials suggests a reduction in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.51, 95% CI 0.30, 0.88; typical risk difference-0.09, 95% CI -0.15, -0. 02) and a trend towards a reduction in mortality (typical relative risk 0.63, 95% CI 0.39, 1.02; typical risk difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.14, 00.00). No complications associated with multiple dose treatment are reported in the identified trials. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsIn infants with established respiratory distress, a policy of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract results in greater improvements regarding oxygenation and ventilatory requirements, a decreased risk of pneumothorax and a trend toward improved survival. The ability to give multiple doses of surfactant to infants with ongoing respiratory insufficiency leads to improved clinical outcome and appears to be the most effective treatment policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.