Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796305›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Multiple versus single dose natural surfactant extract for severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

R F Soll

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surfactant for bacterial pneumonia in late preterm and term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surfactants: past, present and future.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2008
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Overview of surfactant replacement trials.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2005
    Review
  8. [Not Available].Paediatrics & child health · 2005
    Article
  9. Recommendations for neonatal surfactant therapy.Paediatrics & child health · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R F SollDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, A-121 Medical Alumni Building, Burlington, Vermont 05405-0068, USA. rsoll@salus.med.uvm.edu
University of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.

objectivesTo compare the effect of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract to single doses of natural surfactant extract in premature infants with established respiratory distress syndrome. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Medline (MeSH terms: pulmonary surfactant; limits: age groups, newborn infant; publication type, clinical trials), previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference and symposia proceedings, expert informants, and journal hand searching in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing a policy of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract to a policy of single doses of natural surfactant extract in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were considered for this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on clinical outcomes including pneumothorax, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage (all intraventricular hemorrhage and severe intraventricular hemorrhage), chronic lung disease, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality were excerpted by the primary reviewer (R. Soll). Data were analyzed according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. MAIN

resultsTwo randomized controlled trials of multiple vs. single dose natural surfactant extract in infants with established respiratory distress syndrome were identified. Meta-analysis of these trials suggests a reduction in the risk of pneumothorax (typical relative risk 0.51, 95% CI 0.30, 0.88; typical risk difference-0.09, 95% CI -0.15, -0. 02) and a trend towards a reduction in mortality (typical relative risk 0.63, 95% CI 0.39, 1.02; typical risk difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.14, 00.00). No complications associated with multiple dose treatment are reported in the identified trials. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsIn infants with established respiratory distress, a policy of multiple doses of natural surfactant extract results in greater improvements regarding oxygenation and ventilatory requirements, a decreased risk of pneumothorax and a trend toward improved survival. The ability to give multiple doses of surfactant to infants with ongoing respiratory insufficiency leads to improved clinical outcome and appears to be the most effective treatment policy.

Indexed as

Drug Administration ScheduleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePulmonary SurfactantsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID10796305
OpenAlexW1954246662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.