SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Methylxanthine treatment for apnea in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prophylactic methylxanthines for endotracheal extubation in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Prophylactic methylxanthine for prevention of apnoea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Doxapram treatment for apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004Pooled it
- Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Kinesthetic stimulation for preventing apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- Kinesthetic stimulation for treating apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- Kinesthetic stimulation versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial comparing two loading doses of aminophylline.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2002Trial
- A landscape evaluation of caffeine citrate availability and use in newborn care across five low- and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- The effect of caffeine on the ventilatory response to hypercarbia in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2018Article
- Apnea in the newborn.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2008Review
- Sequential updating of a new dynamic pharmacokinetic model for caffeine in premature neonates.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2007Article
- Apnea in the newborn.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2001Review
- Caffeine citrate: a review of its use in apnoea of prematurity.Paediatric drugs · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Methylxanthines have been used to stimulate breathing and prevent apnea and its consequences.
objectivesThe objective of this review is to determine if methylxanthine treatment in preterm infants with recurrent apnea leads to a clinically important reduction in apnea and use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), without clinically important side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts of conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which methylxanthine (theophylline or caffeine) was compared with placebo or no treatment for apnea in preterm infants, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality was assessed independently by the two authors. Data were extracted independently by the two authors. Treatment effects were expressed as relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) and their 95% confidence intervals, using a fixed effect model. For significant results, the inverse of the risk difference (1/RD) was used to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT). MAIN
resultsThe results of four trials which enrolled a total of 110 preterm infants with apnea indicate that methylxanthine therapy leads to a reduction in apnea and use of IPPV in the first 2 - 7 days. There are insufficient data to evaluate side effects and no data to examine effects within different gestational age groups. There are no trial data which examine long term effects. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsMethylxanthines are effective in reducing the number of apneic attacks and the use of mechanical ventilation in the two to seven days after starting treatment. In view of its lower toxicity, caffeine would be the preferred drug. Although the safety of methylxanthine therapy has been suggested in cohort studies, there are no trial data on longterm outcome. In order to indicate which infants are likely to benefit from treatment, there is a need for stratification by gestation and/or other risk factors in future studies. In any future studies the longer term effects of treatment on growth and development should be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.