Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796304›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Methylxanthine treatment for apnea in preterm infants.

D J Henderson-Smart, P Steer

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 254 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prophylactic methylxanthines for endotracheal extubation in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  2. Prophylactic methylxanthine for prevention of apnoea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Doxapram treatment for apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Kinesthetic stimulation for preventing apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  6. Kinesthetic stimulation for treating apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  7. Kinesthetic stimulation versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  8. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial comparing two loading doses of aminophylline.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2002
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Apnea in the newborn.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2008
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Apnea in the newborn.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2001
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D J Henderson-SmartNSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Queen Elizabeth II Institute for Mothers and Infants, Building DO2, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006. dhs@mail.usyd.edu.au
P Steer
Queen Elizabeth II Hospital · GBQueensland Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Methylxanthines have been used to stimulate breathing and prevent apnea and its consequences.

objectivesThe objective of this review is to determine if methylxanthine treatment in preterm infants with recurrent apnea leads to a clinically important reduction in apnea and use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), without clinically important side effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts of conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which methylxanthine (theophylline or caffeine) was compared with placebo or no treatment for apnea in preterm infants, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Methodological quality was assessed independently by the two authors. Data were extracted independently by the two authors. Treatment effects were expressed as relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) and their 95% confidence intervals, using a fixed effect model. For significant results, the inverse of the risk difference (1/RD) was used to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT). MAIN

resultsThe results of four trials which enrolled a total of 110 preterm infants with apnea indicate that methylxanthine therapy leads to a reduction in apnea and use of IPPV in the first 2 - 7 days. There are insufficient data to evaluate side effects and no data to examine effects within different gestational age groups. There are no trial data which examine long term effects. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsMethylxanthines are effective in reducing the number of apneic attacks and the use of mechanical ventilation in the two to seven days after starting treatment. In view of its lower toxicity, caffeine would be the preferred drug. Although the safety of methylxanthine therapy has been suggested in cohort studies, there are no trial data on longterm outcome. In order to indicate which infants are likely to benefit from treatment, there is a need for stratification by gestation and/or other risk factors in future studies. In any future studies the longer term effects of treatment on growth and development should be evaluated.

Indexed as

ApneaCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesTheophyllineVasodilator AgentsXanthinesCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsmethylxanthineTheophyllineVasodilator AgentsXanthines

Identifiers

PMID10796304
OpenAlexW2165730367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.