Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796295›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Fibrinogen depleting agents for acute ischaemic stroke.

M Liu, C Counsell, J Wardlaw

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fibrinogen depleting agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First University Hospital, West China University of Medical Sciences, Chengdu 610041, Sichwan, China. wyplm@public.sc.cninfo.net
C Counsell
J Wardlaw
Sichuan University · CNUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibrinogen depleting agents reduce fibrinogen in blood plasma, reduce blood viscosity and hence increase blood flow. This may help remove the blood clot blocking the artery and re-establish blood flow to the affected area of the brain after an ischaemic stroke. The risk of haemorrhage may be less than with thrombolytic agents.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of fibrinogen depleting agents in people with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Embase (to January 1996) and the Index of scientific and technical proceedings (1982 to 1996). We handsearched 10 Chinese journals and the proceedings of the 4th Chinese Stroke Conference (1995). We contacted Chinese and Japanese researchers, and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of fibrinogen depleting agents started within 14 days of stroke onset, compared with control in patients with definite or possible ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN

resultsThree trials involving 182 patients were included. All trials tested ancrod. Allocation concealment was adequate in two trials. Fibrinolytic therapy appeared to reduce the number of deaths during the scheduled treatment period (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.85). There was no difference in death from all causes at the end of follow-up (odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 1.23). The risk of haemorrhage appeared to be small, but there were too few data to be conclusive. One trial in 132 people showed a statistically non-significant decrease in the odds of being dead or disabled at the end of follow-up (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 1.03). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAlthough ancrod appears to be promising, it is not possible to draw reliable conclusions from the available data.

Indexed as

AncrodBrain IschemiaFibrinolytic AgentsHumansStrokeAncrodFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID10796295
OpenAlexW3152819564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.