SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Family intervention for schizophrenia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Family intervention for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Efficacy of psychological therapy in schizophrenia: conclusions from meta-analyses.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2006Pooled it
- Compliance therapy for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- A randomised multicentre trial of integrated versus standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Trial
- Definitions and drivers of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic literature review.Annals of general psychiatry · 2013Article
- Interpersonal factors in understanding and treating posttraumatic stress disorder.Journal of psychiatric practice · 2009Review
- Cochrane Schizophrenia Group.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2008Review
- Effectiveness of psychoeducation and mutual support group program for family caregivers of chinese people with schizophrenia.The open nursing journal · 2008Article
- Involuntary commitment in psychiatric care: what drives the decision?Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2007Article
- [Evidence-based psychotherapy of schizophrenic disorders].Der Nervenarzt · 2006Article
- Family interventions for mental disorders: efficacy and effectiveness.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been showed that people with schizophrenia from families that express high levels of criticism, hostility, or over involvement, have more frequent relapses than people with similar problems from families that tend to be less expressive of their emotions. Psychosocial interventions designed to reduce these levels of expressed emotions within families now exist for mental health workers. These interventions are proposed as adjuncts rather than alternatives to drug treatments, and their main purpose is to decrease the stress within the family and also the rate of relapse.
objectivesTo estimate the effects of family psychosocial interventions in community settings for the care of those with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like conditions compared to standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (June 1998), EMBASE (1981-1995) and MEDLINE (1966-1995) were undertaken and supplemented with reference searching of the identified literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised studies were selected if they focused on families of people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and compared community-orientated family-based psychosocial intervention of more than five sessions to standard care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were reliably extracted, and, where appropriate and possible, summated. Peto odds ratios (OR), their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and number needed to treat (NNT) were estimated. The reviewers assume that people who died or dropped out had no improvement and tested the sensitivity of the final results to this assumption. MAIN
resultsFamily intervention may decrease the frequency of relapse (one year OR 0.57 CI 0.4-0.8, NNT 6.5 CI 4-14). The trend over time of this main finding is towards the null and some small but negative studies may not have been identified by the search. Family intervention may decrease hospitalisation and encourage compliance with medication but data are few and equivocal. Family intervention does not obviously effect the tendency of individuals/families to drop out of care. It may improve general social impairment and the levels of expressed emotion within the family. This review provides no data to suggest that family intervention either prevents or promotes suicide. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsClinicians, researchers, policy makers and recipients of care cannot be confident of the effects of family intervention from the findings of this review. Further data from already completed trials could greatly inform practice and more trials are justified as long as their participants, interventions and outcomes are generalisable to routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10796294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.