SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging thrombolysis versus direct thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a network meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Argatroban as an Adjunct to Antiplatelet Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Translational stroke research · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Cooling therapy for acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Ginkgo biloba for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Antiplatelet Resistance: A Review of Concepts, Mechanisms, and Implications for Management in Acute Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Comparative effectiveness of combined antiplatelet treatments in acute minor ischaemic stroke.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2022Article
- Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Review
- Associations between the organisation of stroke services, process of care, and mortality in England: prospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Article
- Preventing deep vein thrombosis after stroke: strategies and recommendations.Current treatment options in neurology · 2011Article
- Antiplatelet resistance and thromboembolic complications in neurointerventional procedures.Frontiers in neurology · 2011Article
- Is primary care a neglected piece of the jigsaw in ensuring optimal stroke care? Results of a national study.BMC family practice · 2009Article
- Prevention of ischaemic stroke.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with acute ischaemic stroke, platelets become activated. Antiplatelet therapy might reduce the volume of brain damaged by ischaemia and reduce the risk of early recurrent ischaemic stroke. This might reduce the risk of early death and improve long-term outcome in survivors. However, antiplatelet therapy might also increase the risk of fatal or disabling intracranial haemorrhage.
objectivesThe aim of this review is to assess the net result of antiplatelet therapy in acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (most recent date of search March 1999), the register of trials held by the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration, and MedStrategy (1995). We also contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing antiplatelet therapy started within 14 days of the stroke with control in patients with definite or presumed ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria and assessed trial quality, and for the included trials, extracted and cross-checked the data. MAIN
resultsEight trials involving 41,325 patients were included. Two trials testing aspirin 160 to 300 mg once daily started within 48 hours of onset contributed 98% of the data. The maximum follow-up was six months. With treatment, there was a significant decrease in death or dependency at the end of follow-up (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.91 - 0.98). In absolute terms, 13 more patients were alive and independent at the end of follow-up for every 1000 patients treated. Furthermore, treatment increased the odds of making a complete recovery from the stroke (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 - 1.11). In absolute terms, 10 patients made a complete recovery for every 1000 patients treated. Antiplatelet therapy was associated with a small but definite excess of 2 symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages for every 1000 patients treated, but this was more than offset by a reduction of 7 recurrent ischaemic strokes for every 1000 patients treated. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsAntiplatelet therapy with aspirin 160 to 300 mg daily, given orally (or per rectum in patients who cannot swallow), and started within 48 hours of onset of presumed ischaemic stroke reduces the risk of early recurrent ischaemic stroke without a major risk of early haemorrhagic complications and improves long-term outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.