SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Anticoagulants for acute ischaemic stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lubeluzole for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet agents for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Pharmacological effects and target analysis of Guipi wan in the treatment of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Review
- Efficacy and safety of argatroban in treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Plasminogen activators and ischemic stroke: conditions for acute delivery.Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis · 2013Review
- Blood coagulation factor XII--a neglected player in stroke pathophysiology.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2012Review
- Is deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis appropriate in the medical wards? A clinical pharmacists' intervention study.Pharmacy world & science : PWS · 2010Article
- Treatment for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Presenting beyond Six Hours of Ischemic Symptom Onset : Effectiveness of Intravenous Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Argatroban.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2010Article
- [Recommendations of the European Stroke Initiative for the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage].Der Nervenarzt · 2006Article
- Transient ischemic attack: a neurologic emergency.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2005Review
- Readers' responses to the article entitled "anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism".MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2005Article
- Pharmacological thromboembolic prophylaxis in a medical ward: room for improvement.Journal of general internal medicine · 2002Article
- Taking acute stroke care seriously. In the absence of evidence we should manage acute stroke as a medical emergency.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Arterial indications for the low molecular weight heparins.Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost ischaemic strokes are caused by blood clots blocking an artery in the brain. Clot prevention with anticoagulant therapy could have a significant impact on patient survival, disability and recurrence of stroke.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effect of anticoagulant therapy in the early treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (most recent search: March 1999) and consulted MedStrategy (1995). We also contacted drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing early anticoagulant therapy (started within two weeks of stroke onset) with control in patients with acute presumed or confirmed ischaemic stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. MAIN
resultsTwenty-one trials involving 23,427 patients were included. The quality of the trials varied considerably. The anticoagulants tested were standard unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, heparinoids, oral anticoagulants, and thrombin inhibitors. Based on eight trials (22,450 patients) there was no evidence that anticoagulant therapy reduced the odds of death from all causes (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence intervals 0.98-1.12). Similarly, based on five trials (21, 846 patients), there was no evidence that anticoagulants reduced the odds of being dead or dependent at the end of follow-up (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence intervals 0.94-1.05). Although anticoagulant therapy was associated with about 9 fewer recurrent ischaemic strokes per 1000 patients treated, it was also associated with a similar sized 9 per 1000 increase in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages. Similarly, anticoagulants avoided about 4 pulmonary emboli per 1000, but this benefit was offset by an extra 9 major extracranial haemorrhages per 1000. Sensitivity analyses did not identify a particular type of anticoagulant regimen or patient characteristic associated with net benefit. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsImmediate anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke is not associated with net short- or long-term benefit. The data from this review do not support the routine use of any type of anticoagulant in acute ischaemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.