SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Woman's position during second stage of labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and acceptability of lidocaine spray in reducing perineal pain during spontaneous vaginal delivery: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Trial
- A Hospital-Based Randomized Controlled Trial-Comparing the Outcome of Normal Delivery Between Squatting and Lying Down Positions During Labour.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021Article
- Childbirth in Palestine.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2005Article
- Mobility and maternal position during childbirth in Tanzania: an exploratory study at four government hospitals.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2004Article
- Women's position during labour: influence on maternal and neonatal outcome.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2003Article
- The Effectiveness of Prenatal Intervention on Pain and Anxiety during the Process of Childbirth-Northern Iran: Clinical Trial Study.Annals of medical and health sciences researchArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor centuries, there has been controversy around whether being upright (sitting, birthing stools, chairs, squatting) or lying down have advantages for women delivering their babies.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the benefits and risks of the use of different positions during the second stage of labour (i. e. from full dilatation of the cervix). SEARCH STRATEGY: Relevant trials are identified from the register of trials maintained by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, and from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included which compared various positions assumed by pregnant women during the second stage of labour. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials with appropriate follow-up were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trials were independently assessed for inclusion, and data extracted, by the two authors. Disagreements would have been resolved by consensus with an editor. Meta-analysis of data is performed using the RevMan software. MAIN
resultsResults should be interpreted with caution as the methodological quality of the 18 trials was variable. Use of any upright or lateral position, compared with supine or lithotomy positions, was associated with: 1. Reduced duration of second stage of labour (12 trials - mean 5.4 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9 - 6.9 minutes). This was largely due to a considerable reduction in women allocated to use of the birth cushion. 2. A small reduction in assisted deliveries (17 trials - odds ratio (OR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 - 0.98). 3. A reduction in episiotomies (11 trials - OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64 - 0.84). 4. A smaller increase in second degree perineal tears (10 trials - OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.54). 5. Increased estimated risk of blood loss > 500ml (10 trials - OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34 - 3.32). 6. Reduced reporting of severe pain during second stage of labour (1 trial - OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.83). 7. Fewer abnormal fetal heart rate patterns (1 trial - OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 - 0.91). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe tentative findings of this review suggest several possible benefits for upright posture, with the possibility of increased risk of blood loss > 500ml. Women should be encouraged to give birth in the position they find most comfortable. Until such time the benefits and risks of various delivery positions are estimated with greater certainty when methodologically stringent trials data are available, then women should be allowed to make informed choices about the birth positions in which they might wish to assume for delivery of their babies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.