Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796273›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Erythromycin for feeding intolerance in preterm infants.

E Ng, V Shah

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E NgDivision of Neonatology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8. eugene.ng@sickkids.on.ca
V Shah
Health Sciences Centre · CAMount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional immaturity of gastointestinal motility predisposes preterm infants to feeding intolerance. Motilin, a gastrointestinal peptide, stimulates propagative contractile activity during phase III of the migratory motor complex in the interdigestive state. Erythromycin (EM) is a motilin agonist with prokinetic effect at low doses (1-3mg/kg).

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of EM in promoting gastrointestinal motility in preterm infants with feeding intolerance and assess clinically significant adverse effects associated with its use. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic literature search in accordance with the Cochrane Neonatal Collaborative Review Group search strategy. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of EM use, at any dose, in preterm infants to promote gastrointestinal motility were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, reference lists of published studies, personal files, and abstracts published in Pediatric Research. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of oral or intravenous EM use at dose range of 3 to 12 mg/kg/day in preterm infants less than or equal to 36 weeks gestational age with feeding tolerance were included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding the primary clinical outcome of days to achieve full enteral feeding were compared among studies. Data on secondary outcomes including adverse effects associated with the use of EM (diarrhea, nosocomial infections, cardiac arrhythmias, or theophylline toxicity), duration of parenteral nutrition, weight gain, incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, and length of hospital stay were assessed. MAIN

resultsTwo randomized controlled studies of EM use in preterm infants for improving gastrointestinal motility were identified. Since both studies involved preterm infants treated with EM at dose >12mg/kg/day at commencement of feeding, they did not meet inclusion criteria defined a priori for this review. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of NEC (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.11, 3.01; RD -0.021, 95%CI -0. 087, 0.045). No statistically significant difference was noted in days to achieve full enteral feeds, length of hospital stay, and adverse events between groups. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsEM at antimicrobial doses may not be effective in preterm infants with feeding intolerance. Further studies are needed to determine whether EM in lower doses is effective as a prokinetic agent in such infants.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MotilityAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinGastrointestinal AgentsGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinGastrointestinal Agents

Identifiers

PMID10796273
OpenAlexW1494325917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.