Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796268›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Treatments for toxoplasmosis in pregnancy.

F Peyron, M Wallon, C Liou, P Garner

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prenatal education for congenital toxoplasmosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Distribution ofF1000Research · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis during pregnancy, postpartum period and lactation: clinical observations.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Neglected parasitic infections in the United States: toxoplasmosis.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Article
  15. Toxoplasmosis and pregnancy.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F PeyronLaboratoire de Parasitologie, Mycologie Medicale et Pathologie Exotique, Universite Claude Bernard - Lyon 1, 8 avenue Rockefeller, 69373 Lyon, Cedex 08, France. peyron@cismsun.univ-lyon1.fr
M Wallon
C Liou
P Garner
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxoplasmosis is a widespread parasitic disease and usually causes no symptoms. However, infection of pregnant women may cause congenital infection, resulting potentially in mental retardation and blindness in the infant.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess whether or not treating toxoplasmosis in pregnancy reduces the risk of congenital toxoplasma infection and improves infant outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched. An electronic search was performed using the key words 'congenital and toxoplasmosis' on the following databases: MEDLINE (1966-07/1997), Embase (1993-07/1997), Pascal (French) (1990-1997), Biological Abstracts (1993-1995) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. There was also contact with experts in the field, including those in the European Research Network on Congenital Toxoplasmosis. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of antibiotic treatment versus no treatment of pregnant women with proven or likely acute Toxoplasma infection, with outcomes in the children reported. We also inspected relevant reports of less robust experimental studies in which there were (non randomly allocated) control groups, although it was not planned to include such data in the primary analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reports of possibly eligible studies were scrutinised by two investigators. MAIN

resultsOut of the 2591 papers identified, none met the inclusion criteria. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsDespite the large number of studies performed over the last three decades we still do not know whether antenatal treatment in women with presumed toxoplasmosis reduces the congenital transmission of Toxoplasma gondii. Screening is expensive, so we need to evaluate the effects of treatment, and the impact of screening programmes. In countries where screening or treatment is not routine, these technologies should not be introduced outside the context of a carefully controlled trial.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousToxoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID10796268
PMCPMC8406945
OpenAlexW1551997539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.