SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Support for breastfeeding mothers.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of primary care-based interventions to promote breastfeeding: systematic evidence review and meta-analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.Annals of family medicinePooled it
- A randomized controlled community-based trial to improve breastfeeding rates among urban low-income mothers.Academic pediatricsTrial
- A Framework for the Development of maternal quality of care indicators.Maternal and child health journal · 2005Article
- [Breast feeding support, incidence of breastfeeding and duration of breast feeding in a Vienna perinatal center].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2003Article
- Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the baby friendly hospital initiative.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExclusive breastfeeding rates at three to four months remain low in many health care settings. In economically advantaged countries, young mothers, those in low-income groups or those who ceased full-time education at an early age are least likely to breastfeed. In poorer countries, more affluent groups may breastfeed less.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of breastfeeding support. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (last searched March 1998), Medline (from 1993), Embase (from 1980), Cinahl, Midirs (from 1991), English National Health Board database and reference lists of articles. We contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials of acceptable quality comparing extra support for breastfeeding mothers with usual maternity care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by the second reviewer. MAIN
resultsThirteen trials were included. The relative risk for stopping exclusive feeding within two months was 0. 83, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.96. The relative risk for stopping breastfeeding within two months was 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.86. One more mother will breastfeed for two months if support is provided for nine women (95% confidence interval 6 to 21). Similarly, one more woman will breastfeed exclusively if support is given to nine women (95% confidence interval 6 to 40). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThe provision of extra support by professionals with special skills in breastfeeding appears to result in more mothers breastfeeding their babies until two months of age, and more mothers breastfeeding their babies exclusively to two months of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10796249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.