SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
D-Penicillamine for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.
objectivesTo answer the question: Among very low birth weight infants, what is the effect of prophylactic administration of d-penicillamine on the incidence of acute ROP or severe ROP, and side effects including death? SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of multiple electronic databases, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conference/symposia proceedings, and expert informants. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that administered d-penicillamine to infants less than 2000g birth weight within the day following birth were considered relevant to this review. Additional case series were examined for potential side effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on clinical outcomes were excerpted by 3 reviewers independently, and consensus reached. Data analysis was conducted according to the standards of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. MAIN
resultsTwo randomized trials on the effects on ROP were identified. When combined, they showed a significantly lower incidence of acute ROP in the treated infants, relative risk of 0.09, 95% CI [0.01,0.71]. Severe stages of ROP could not be analyzed. There was no effect on death rates, relative risk 0.99 95% CI [0.70,1.39]. No side effects were reported, and follow up at one year revealed no significant differences in spasticity or developmental delay, although there were more rehospitalizations among the controls. In other reports of using d-penicillamine in over 140 infants for hyperbilirubinemia, skin rashes were reported in 2 infants and one had vomiting that may have been related. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsD-penicillamine is unlikely to affect survival, and may reduce the incidence of acute ROP among survivors. Studies to date justify further investigation of this drug in a broader population; careful attention to possible side effects is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.