SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Duration of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Interventions for covert bacteriuria in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Different antibiotic regimens for treating asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Fosfomycin in a single dose versus a 7-day course of amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2009Trial
- Is single-dose fosfomycin trometamol a good alternative for asymptomatic bacteriuria in the second trimesterof pregnancy?International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2007Trial
- The kidney in pregnancy: A journey of three decades.Indian journal of nephrology · 2012Article
- Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study.BMC medical research methodology · 2011Article
- Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?BMC public health · 2010Article
- [Nosocomial urinary tract infection in adults].Der Internist · 2006Review
- [Therapy of the acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2006Review
- Urinary tract infections in adult general practice patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA Cochrane systematic review has shown that drug treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women substantially decreases the risk of pyelonephritis and reduces the risk of preterm delivery. However, it is not clear whether single dose therapy is as effective as longer conventional antibiotic treatment.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of different durations of treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing antimicrobial therapeutic regimens that differed in duration (particularly comparing single dose with longer duration regimens) in pregnant women diagnosed with asymptomatic bacteriuria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by the reviewers. MAIN
resultsEight studies involving over 400 women were included. All were comparisons of single dose treatment with four to seven day treatments. The trials were generally of poor quality. No difference in 'no-cure' rate was detected between single dose and short course (4-7 day) treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women (relative risk 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.54) as well as in the recurrent asymptomtic bacteriuria (relative risk 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.66). However these results showed significant heterogeneity. No differences were detected for preterm births and pyelonephritis although sample size of trials was small. Longer duration treatment was associated with an increase in reports of adverse effects (relative risk 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.31 to 0.91). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is not enough evidence to evaluate whether single dose or longer duration doses are more effective in treating asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. Because single dose has lower cost and increases compliance, this comparison should be explored in a properly sized randomized controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.