Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796201›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Kinesthetic stimulation for preventing apnea in preterm infants.

D J Henderson-Smart, D A Osborn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Kinesthetic stimulation for preventing apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  2. Kinesthetic stimulation for treating apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  3. Kinesthetic stimulation versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Immature control of breathing and apnea of prematurity: the known and unknown.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Review
  7. Apnea of prematurity: from cause to treatment.European journal of pediatrics · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D J Henderson-SmartNSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Queen Elizabeth II Institute for Mothers and Infants, Building DO2, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006. dhs@mail.usyd.edu.au
D A Osborn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia, which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation or other treatments. Physical stimulation is often used to restart breathing and it is possible that repeated stimulation, such as with an oscillating mattress (kinesthetic stimulation), might prevent apnea and its consequences.

objectivesIn preterm infants at risk for apnea, does prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation lead to a clinically important reduction in apnea and bradycardia, and use of intemittent positive preswsure ventilation (IPPV). SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials in preterm infants at risk of developing clinical apnea which utilised random or quasi-random allocation to treatment with an oscillating mattress or control, were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author and synthesis of the data using relative risk. MAIN

resultsThere were no differences in short term effects (apnea /bradycardia, IVH, use of IPPV, sleep/wake cycles and neurological status at discharge) or longterm effects (in one trial - growth and development to one year). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsImplications for practice. Prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation cannot be recommended to reduce apnea/bradycardia in preterm infants. Implications for research. There are currently no clear research questions regarding prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation to prevent apnea in preterm infants.

Indexed as

BedsApneaHumansInfant EquipmentInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesKinesiology, AppliedPhysical Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID10796201
PMCPMC7032617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.