Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796189›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Interventions for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.

P Brocklehurst, M Hannah, H McDonald

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage is still a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic quagmire.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. Should we screen for and treat it?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P BrocklehurstNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LF. peter.brocklehurst@perinat.ox.ac.uk
M Hannah
H McDonald
Perinatal Institute · GBWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial vaginosis has been associated with poor perinatal outcome. Since the infections are amenable to treatment, identification during pregnancy and treatment may reduce the risk of preterm birth and its consequences.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotic treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing one antibiotic regimen with placebo or no treatment, or which compare two or more alternative antibiotic regimens in pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessments and data extraction were done independently by three reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN

resultsFive trials involving 1504 women were included. These trials were of good quality. Antibiotic therapy was highly effective at eradicating infection during pregnancy as judged by 'test-of-cure' following therapy (odds ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.27). The effect of treating bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy showed a trend to less births before 37 weeks gestation (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.02). The prevention of preterm birth less than 37 weeks gestation was most marked in the subgroup of women with a previous preterm birth (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0. 60). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe current evidence does not support screening and treating all pregnant women for bacterial vaginosis to prevent preterm birth and its consequences. For women with a history of a previous preterm birth there is some suggestion that detection and treatment of bacterial vaginosis early in pregnancy may prevent a proportion of these women having a further preterm birth. It is not known whether this is associated with an improvement in neonatal well-being.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousVaginosis, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID10796189
OpenAlexW1526092128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.