Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796188›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Antibiotics for preterm labour with intact membranes.

J King, V Flenady

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J KingPerinatal Epidemiology Unit, Mater Hospital, Raymond Tce, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101. jking@mater.org.au
V Flenady
Mater Health Services · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere may be a link between infection and preterm birth.

objectivesSince rupture of the membranes is an important factor in the progression of preterm labour, it is important to see if antibiotics are of any benefit prior to membrane rupture. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotics administered to women in preterm labour with intact membranes, on maternal and neonatal outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register and reference lists of articles. We contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials which compared antibiotic treatment with placebo or no treatment for women in preterm labour (between 20 and 36 weeks gestation) with intact membranes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for missing data. MAIN

resultsMeta-analysis of the ten included trials demonstrated a statistically significant prolongation of pregnancy associated with the use of antibiotics (5. 4 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9- 9.8 days). Antibiotic treatment was also associated with a statistically significant reduction in maternal infection (odds ratio (OR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.36, 0.97) and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13, 0.88). No statistically significant effect was detected on the neonatal outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal sepsis, although there was a trend towards the latter (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.07). An increase in perinatal mortality was observed in the group receiving antibiotics (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.21, 9.32). REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAlthough a prolongation in time to delivery and a trend towards a reduction in neonatal sepsis was detected, this review fails to demonstrate a clear overall benefit from antibiotic treatment for preterm labour with intact membranes on neonatal outcomes and raises concerns about increased perinatal mortality for those who received antibiotics. This treatment cannot therefore be currently recommended for routine practice. Further research is required to identify a subgroup of women (and their babies) who are more likely to experience benefit from antibiotic treatment for preterm labour prior to membrane rupture, and to identify which antibiotic or combination of antibiotics is most effective. The results of the ongoing ORACLE trial should help resolve some of the uncertainties revealed by this review.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansObstetric Labor, PrematurePregnancyAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID10796188
OpenAlexW15963780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.