SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of ibuprofen versus indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus.European journal of pediatrics · 2005Pooled it
- Indomethacin for asymptomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Dopamine versus no treatment to prevent renal dysfunction in indomethacin-treated preterm newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Delayed microglial depletion protects against white matter injury following neonatal cerebral hemorrhage in mice.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Neonatal Outcomes With and Without Prophylaxis With Indomethacin in Premature Neonates.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021Article
- Prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2009Article
- Patent ductus arteriosus: lack of evidence for common treatments.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2007Review
- Is surgical ligation of patent ductus arteriosus necessary? The Western Australian experience of conservative management.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2005Article
- Treating extremely low birthweight infants with prophylactic indomethacin. Evidence for short term benefits only.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Article
- Comparative tolerability of pharmacological treatments for patent ductus arteriosus.Drug safety · 2001Review
- Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal perforation in extremely premature infants receiving early indomethacin treatment for patent ductus arteriosus.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.
objectivesIndomethacin is used to treat symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus and may prevent or limit intraventricular haemorrhage in the neonatal period. This review examines the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous indomethacin in reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with these conditions in infants weighing less than 1750 grams at birth. SEARCH STRATEGY: A literature search from January 1980 to October 1994 was made in three computerised data bases: Medline; Embase; and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. The search was updated in February 1997. SELECTION CRITERIA: Strict selection criteria were applied to clinical trials: the population had to be newborn infants of birth weight < 1751 grams; the intervention had to be prophylactic intravenous indomethacin; the trial had to be randomised and controlled; and at least one of several prespecified outcomes had to be reported in the results. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methodological quality of each study was assessed using explicit criteria. Data on relevant outcome measures were extracted on two separate occasions and, where appropriate, the results of individual trials were combined using meta-analysis techniques to provide a pooled estimate of effect. MAIN
resultsThere is a trend towards reduced neonatal mortality in infants receiving prophylactic indomethacin, pooled relative risk (RR) = 0. 85 [95% CI 0.66 to 1.09]. The incidence of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus is significantly reduced in treated infants, pooled RR = 0.35 [0.26 to 0.47] but there is no evidence that treatment affects respiratory outcomes. Prophylactic indomethacin significantly reduces the incidence of Grade 3 and 4 intraventricular haemorrhage in treated infants, pooled RR = 0.60 [0.43 to 0.83]. There is no evidence to suggest prophylactic indomethacin is associated with any long term adverse effect although there is a trend in treated infants towards an increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis, and some evidence that treatment may transiently impair renal function. There is no evidence that haemostasis is disturbed. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsProphylactic treatment with indomethacin has a number of immediate benefits, in particular a reduction in symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus and severe intraventricular haemorrhage. There is no evidence at present of long-term harm. Further trials are needed to assess more precisely the effects, both beneficial and harmful, on short and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.