SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Peritoneal non-closure at caesarean section.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- [Approaches to the abdominal cavity and closure of the abdominal wall].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been suggested that the peritoneal suture might be omitted during caesarean section without adverse effects.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of non-closure as an alternative to closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section on intra-operative and immediate postoperative outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials comparing leaving the visceral and/or parietal peritoneum unsutured at caesarean section with a technique which involves suturing the peritoneum in women undergoing elective or emergency caesarean section. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted by two reviewers. MAIN
resultsFour trials involving 1194 women were included. Non-closure of the peritoneum saved operating time (weighted mean difference of -6.12 minutes, 95% confidence interval -8.00 to -4.27) with no significant differences in postoperative morbidity, analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay. There was a consistent, although nonsignificant, trend for improved immediate postoperative outcome if the peritoneum was not closed. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere seems to be no significant difference in short term morbidity from non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.