Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10796162›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term.

R C Pattinson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Techniques for caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  2. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2020
    Article
  3. Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2017
    Article
  4. Determining the Incidence of Gynecoid Pelvis Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Nonpregnant Multiparous Women.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2016
    Article
  5. Pregnancy, parturition and preeclampsia in women of African ancestry.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2014
    Review
  6. Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R C PattinsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kalafong Hospital and University of Pretoria, Private Bag X396, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa. rcpattin@kalafong.up.ac.za
University of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvimetry assesses the size of a woman's pelvis by clinical examination, or by conventional X-rays, computerised tomography scanning, or magnetic resonance imaging.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to assess the effects of pelvimetry (performed antenatally, intrapartum or postpartum) on the method of delivery, and on perinatal mortality and morbidity, and on maternal morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register was searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Acceptably randomised comparisons of the use of pelvimetry in cephalic presentations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted by one author. MAIN

resultsFour trials of over 1000 women were included. The trials were generally not of good quality. Women undergoing pelvimetry were more likely to be delivered by caesarean section (odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.63 to 2.88). No significant impact was detected on perinatal outcome. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is not enough evidence to support the use of X-ray pelvimetry in women whose fetuses have a cephalic presentation.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor PresentationPelvimetryCesarean SectionFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID10796162
OpenAlexW1516511674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.