Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10781048›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

Analysis of a complete homeobox gene repertoire: implications for the evolution of diversity.

C Kappen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The shoot apical meristem: the dynamics of a stable structure.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2002
    Review
  6. The homeobox gene BREVIPEDICELLUS is a key regulator of inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  7. Wanda: a database of duplicated fish genes.Nucleic acids research · 2002
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Introduction. The evolution of evo-devo biology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C KappenS. C. Johnson Medical Research Center, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA. ckappen@unmc.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The completion of sequencing projects for various organisms has already advanced our insight into the evolution of entire genomes and the role of gene duplications. One multigene family that has served as a paradigm for the study of gene duplications and molecular evolution is the family of homeodomain-encoding genes. I present here an analysis of the homeodomain repertoire of an entire genome, that of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, in relation to our current knowledge of these genes in plants, arthropods, and mammals. A methodological framework is developed that proposes approaches for the analysis of homeodomain repertoires and multigene families in general.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, HomeoboxGenetic VariationMultigene FamilyPhylogenyAnimalsArthropodsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophilaMammalsModels, GeneticPlantsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID10781048
PMCPMC18260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.