ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000
Evidence for a M(1) muscarinic receptor on the endothelium of human pulmonary veins.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autonomic control of the pulmonary circulation: Implications for pulmonary hypertension.Experimental physiology · 2025Review
- Muscarinic Receptors in Cardioprotection and Vascular Tone Regulation.Physiological research · 2024Review
- Muscarinic control of cardiovascular function in humans: a review of current clinical evidence.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024Review
- The Role of the Acetylcholine System in Common Respiratory Diseases and COVID-19.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review of Natural Resources With Vasodilation: Traditional Medicinal Plants, Natural Products, and Their Mechanism and Clinical Efficacy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Vasorelaxant properties of Vernonia amygdalina ethanol extract and its possible mechanism.Pharmaceutical biology · 2017Article
- Overview of Antagonists Used for Determining the Mechanisms of Action Employed by Potential Vasodilators with Their Suggested Signaling Pathways.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- Pharmacological characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes mediating vasoconstriction of human umbilical vein.British journal of pharmacology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. To characterize the muscarinic receptors on human pulmonary veins associated with the acetylcholine (ACh)-induced relaxation, isolated venous and arterial preparations were pre-contracted with noradrenaline (10 microM) and were subsequently challenged with ACh in the absence or presence of selective muscarinic antagonists. 2. ACh relaxed venous preparations derived from human lung with a pD(2) value of 5.82+/-0.09 (n=16). In venous preparations where the endothelium had been removed, the ACh relaxations were abolished (n=4). ACh relaxed arterial preparations with a pD(2) value of 7. 06+/-0.14 (n=5). 3. Atropine (1 microM), the non selective antagonist for muscarinic receptors, inhibited ACh-induced relaxations in human pulmonary veins. The affinity value (pK(B) value) for atropine was: 8.64+/-0.10 (n=5). The selective muscarinic antagonists (darifenacin (M(3)), himbacine (M(2),M(4)), methoctramine (M(2)) and pFHHSiD (M(1),M(3))) also inhibited ACh-induced relaxations in venous preparations. The pK(B) values obtained for these antagonists were not those predicted for the involvement of M(2 - 5) receptors in the ACh-induced relaxation in human pulmonary veins. 4. The pK(B) value for darifenacin (1 microM) was significantly greater in human pulmonary arterial (8.63+/-0.14) than in venous (7.41+/-0.20) preparations derived from three lung samples. 5. In human pulmonary veins, the pK(B) values for pirenzepine (0.5 and 1 microM), a selective antagonist for M(1) receptors, were: 7.89+/-0.24 (n=7) and 8.18+/-0.22 (n=5), respectively. In the venous preparations, the pK(B) values derived from the functional studies with all the different muscarinic antagonists used were correlated (r=0.89; P=0.04; slope=0.78) with the affinity values (pK(i) values) previously published for human cloned m1 receptors in CHO cells. 6. These results suggest that the relaxations induced by ACh are due to the activation of M(1) receptors on endothelial cells in isolated human pulmonary veins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.