Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10780575›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine

Pepsin and the esophagus.

B I Hirschowitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Stromal cells participate in the murine esophageal mucosal injury response.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

B I HirschowitzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-0007, USA. bhirschowitz@gihep.uab.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophagitis results from excessive exposure of the esophagus to gastric juice through an ineffective or dysfunctional lower esophageal sphincter mechanism. A possible role of pepsin in damaging the esophageal mucosa with consequent esophagitis may be examined directly by testing pepsin under various conditions in experimental models of esophagitis. Since gastric juice contains both acid and pepsin, all experiments examine separately effects of perfusion of the esophagus by acid without and with pepsin in various combinations. Acid perfusion alone at concentrations represented by pH 1.3 or above does not produce esophagitis. The addition of pepsin to acid between pH 1 and 3.5 causes considerable acute esophageal damage. Outside the proteolytic range, i.e., higher than pH 3.5, pepsin does not damage the esophagus. The damage caused by acidified pepsin may be made much worse by the further addition of aspirin or other NSAIDs, presumably by further breaking down mucosal barriers.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsDisease Models, AnimalEsophagitisEsophagogastric JunctionGastric JuiceHumansMucous MembraneOmeprazolePepsin AAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsOmeprazolePepsin A

Identifiers

PMID10780575
PMCPMC2579005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.