Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10777728›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

A bimodal pattern of InsP(3)-evoked elementary Ca(2+) signals in pancreatic acinar cells.

K E Fogarty, J F Kidd, R A Tuft, P Thorn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K E FogartyBiomedical Imaging Group, Department of Physiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01650 USA.
J F Kidd
R A Tuft
P Thorn

Funding

SCANNING PARTIAL CONFOCAL MICROSCOPER01RR009799 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CARRINGTON, WALTER A. · 1995 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS R01 5RR09799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

InsP(3)-evoked elementary Ca(2+) release events have been postulated to play a role in providing the building blocks of larger Ca(2+) signals. In pancreatic acinar cells, low concentrations of acetylcholine or the injection of low concentrations of InsP(3) elicit a train of spatially localized Ca(2+) spikes. In this study we have quantified these responses and compared the Ca(2+) signals to the elementary events shown in Xenopus oocytes. The results demonstrate, at the same concentrations of InsP(3), Ca(2+) signals consisting of one population of small transient Ca(2+) release events and a second distinct population of larger Ca(2+) spikes. The signal mass amplitudes of both types of events are within the range of amplitudes for the elementary events in Xenopus oocytes. However, the bimodal Ca(2+) distribution of Ca(2+) responses we observe is not consistent with the continuum of event sizes seen in Xenopus. We conclude that the two types of InsP(3)-dependent events in acinar cells are both elementary Ca(2+) signals, which are independent of one another. Our data indicate a complexity to the organization of the Ca(2+) release apparatus in acinar cells, which might result from the presence of multiple InsP(3) receptor isoforms, and is likely to be important in the physiology of these cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCalcium ChannelsCalcium SignalingFemaleInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceOocytesPancreasPatch-Clamp TechniquesProtein IsoformsCalcium ChannelsInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsProtein IsoformsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID10777728
PMCPMC1300821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.