Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10777723›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

Dynamics of fusion pores connecting membranes of different tensions.

Y A Chizmadzhev, P I Kuzmin, D A Kumenko, J Zimmerberg, F S Cohen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Membrane tension and membrane fusion.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Teardrop shapes minimize bending energy of fusion pores connecting planar bilayers.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Multiple roles for the actin cytoskeleton during regulated exocytosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Y A ChizmadzhevFrumkin Institute of Electrochemistry, Moscow, Russia.
P I Kuzmin
D A Kumenko
J Zimmerberg
F S Cohen
Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry · RUEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

MODEL SYSTEM FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL EXOCYTOSISR01GM027367 · NIGMS · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COHEN, FREDRIC S · 1985 to 2009
$4.2M
EXOCYTOTIC MEMBRANE FUSIONZ01HD001415 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI ZIMMERBERG, JOSHUA · 1991 to 2008
$1.9M
BIOPHYSICS OF INFLUENZA HEMAGGLUTININ-MEDIATED FUSIONR03TW000715 · FIC · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COHEN, FREDRIC S · 1996 to 2001
$79k
FIC NIH HHS R03 TW00715NIGMS NIH HHS GM 27367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The energetics underlying the expansion of fusion pores connecting biological or lipid bilayer membranes is elucidated. The energetics necessary to deform membranes as the pore enlarges, in some combination with the action of the fusion proteins, must determine pore growth. The dynamics of pore growth is considered for the case of two homogeneous fusing membranes under different tensions. It is rigorously shown that pore growth can be quantitatively described by treating the pore as a quasiparticle that moves in a medium with a viscosity determined by that of the membranes. Motion is subject to tension, bending, and viscous forces. Pore dynamics and lipid flow through the pore were calculated using Lagrange's equations, with dissipation caused by intra- and intermonolayer friction. These calculations show that the energy barrier that restrains pore enlargement depends only on the sum of the tensions; a difference in tension between the fusing membranes is irrelevant. In contrast, lipid flux through the fusion pore depends on the tension difference but is independent of the sum. Thus pore growth is not affected by tension-driven lipid flux from one membrane to the other. The calculations of the present study explain how increases in tension through osmotic swelling of vesicles cause enlargement of pores between the vesicles and planar bilayer membranes. In a similar fashion, swelling of secretory granules after fusion in biological systems could promote pore enlargement during exocytosis. The calculations also show that pore expansion can be caused by pore lengthening; lengthening may be facilitated by fusion proteins.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsEnergy MetabolismLipid BilayersMembrane FusionMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalOsmotic PressureThermodynamicsLipid BilayersMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10777723
PMCPMC1300816
OpenAlexW1971457402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.