Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10776837›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

Docetaxel: an update of its use in advanced breast cancer.

D P Figgitt, L R Wiseman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pulmonary toxicity in patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2010
    Article
  9. Cost-effectiveness analyses of docetaxel versus paclitaxel once weekly in patients with metastatic breast cancer in progression following anthracycline chemotherapy, in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2010
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Nail changes due to docetaxel--a neglected side effect and nuisance for the patient.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2007
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D P FiggittAdis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
L R Wiseman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledDocetaxel, a semisynthetic member of the taxoid class of antineoplastic agents, is effective in the treatment of patients with advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) breast cancer. Reported objective response rates for docetaxel 100 mg/m2 ranged from 54 to 69% and 53 to 82% as first-line monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. Objective response rates of 23 to 65% and 30 to 81% have been reported for docetaxel as second-line monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. In Japanese studies, second-line docetaxel 60 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 42 to 55%. At the recommended dose of 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks, docetaxel had significantly greater efficacy than doxorubicin, mitomycin plus vinblastine and methotrexate plus fluorouracil, and similar efficacy to fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer. In chemotherapy-naive patients, first-line combined therapy with docetaxel and doxorubicin had significantly greater efficacy than doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Promising results have been achieved in phase I/II trials of a weekly regimen of docetaxel (generally 30 to 45 mg/m2). Preliminary data indicate a potential role for docetaxel in the neoadjuvant therapy of early breast cancer. The major dose-limiting adverse event associated with docetaxel is neutropenia. Although other adverse events are common, the tolerability profile of docetaxel is generally acceptable in the majority of patients, particularly in comparison with other antineoplastic regimens.

conclusionsAlthough no single standard regimen has been identified as optimal for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, phase III trials have shown that docetaxel has improved efficacy over doxorubicin alone (considered one of the current gold standards), methotrexate/fluorouracil and mitomycin/vinblastine in second-line therapy. In combination with doxorubicin, docetaxel has demonstrated better efficacy than doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in first-line therapy. These results provide a basis for therapy choice in advanced breast cancer. Clinical trials comparing docetaxel monotherapy versus paclitaxel monotherapy and versus docetaxel combination therapy are warranted. The role of docetaxel in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer is being evaluated.

Indexed as

TaxoidsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDocetaxelDrug Administration ScheduleEconomics, PharmaceuticalFemaleHumansMetabolic Clearance RatePaclitaxelTissue DistributionTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicDocetaxelPaclitaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID10776837
OpenAlexW2032047915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.