ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics
Rett syndrome.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Rett Syndrome Mutations on MeCP2 MBD Stability.Biochemistry · 2015Article
- Structural, Dynamical, and Energetical Consequences of Rett Syndrome Mutation R133C in MeCP2.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015Article
- Correlation of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter densities in the striata to the clinical abilities of women with Rett syndrome.Synapse (New York, N.Y.) · 2012Article
- Enhanced cell death in MeCP2 null cerebellar granule neurons exposed to excitotoxicity and hypoxia.Neuroscience · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rett syndrome (RS) is a neurological disorder that mainly, and possibly exclusively, affects girls. After its description in 1966 by Andreas Rett in the Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, awareness and interest in RS were enhanced by the 1983 report of Hagberg et al. in the Annals of Neurology. Diagnosis, and indeed the hypothesis that it exists, continue to be based upon a consistent constellation of clinical features observed in thousands of female patients world-wide. A diagnostic marker has not been identified. Notwithstanding this serious limitation, it is generally agreed that RS is a distinct entity and that it is genetically determined. Although it is associated with devastating loss of function between infancy and the fifth year of life, its course becomes relatively static thereafter, setting it apart from most of the genetic neurodegenerative disorders of childhood. Neuropathological and neurochemical studies call attention to RS as a neurodevelopmental disorder. Clarification of its pathogenesis may provide new insight into normal brain development. This report summarizes existing information and concepts about RS, and presents recent advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.