Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10764368›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial.

V Lattimer, F Sassi, S George, M Moore, J Turnbull, M Mullee, H Smith

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The effect of GP telephone triage on numbers seeking same-day appointments.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  20. Outreach clinics in the new NHS: not yet the end of outpatients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

V LattimerHealth Care Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD.
F Sassi
S George
M Moore
J Turnbull
M Mullee
H Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo undertake an economic evaluation of nurse telephone consultation using decision support software in comparison with usual general practice care provided by a general practice cooperative.

designCost analysis from an NHS perspective using stochastic data from a randomised controlled trial.

settingGeneral practice cooperative with 55 general practitioners serving 97 000 registered patients in Wiltshire, England. SUBJECTS: All patients contacting the service, or about whom the service was contacted during the trial year (January 1997 to January 1998).

main outcome measuresCosts and savings to the NHS during the trial year.

resultsThe cost of providing nurse telephone consultation was 81 237 pound sterling per annum. This, however, determined a 94 422 pound sterling reduction of other costs for the NHS arising from reduced emergency admissions to hospital. Using point estimates for savings, the cost analysis, combined with the analysis of outcomes, showed a dominance situation for the intervention over general practice cooperative care alone. If a larger improvement in outcomes is assumed (upper 95% confidence limit) NHS savings increase to 123 824 pound sterling per annum. Savings of only 3728 pound sterling would, however, arise in a scenario where lower 95% confidence limits for outcome differences were observed. To break even, the intervention would have needed to save 138 emergency hospital admissions per year, around 90% of the effect achieved in the trial. Additional savings of 16 928 pound sterling for general practice arose from reduced travel to visit patients at home and fewer surgery appointments within three days of a call.

conclusionsNurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care may reduce NHS costs in the long term by reducing demand for emergency admission to hospital. General practitioners currently bear most of the cost of nurse telephone consultation and benefit least from the savings associated with it. This indicates that the service produces benefits in terms of service quality, which are beyond the reach of this cost analysis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCosts and Cost AnalysisCost SavingsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalEmergenciesEmergency Medical ServicesEnglandFamily PracticeHospitalizationHotlinesHouse CallsHumansNursing ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareProspective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID10764368
PMCPMC27349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.