Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
Cost analysis of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: evidence from a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of doctor-nurse substitution strategies in primary care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of organizational interventions to reduce emergency department utilization: a systematic review.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Trial
- The effectiveness of nurse practitioners working at a GP cooperative: a study protocol.BMC family practice · 2012Trial
- 'PhysioDirect' telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2009Trial
- Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.Quality & safety in health care · 2004Trial
- Nurse triage in primary care: concept analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The need for a broad perspective when assessing value-for-money for out-of-hours primary care.Primary health care research & development · 2024Review
- Article
- A telephone assessment and advice service within an ED physiotherapy clinic: a single-site quality improvement cohort study.Archives of physiotherapy · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Why a successful task substitution in glaucoma care could not be transferred from a hospital setting to a primary care setting: a qualitative study.Implementation science : IS · 2013Article
- Safety of telephone triage in general practitioner cooperatives: do triage nurses correctly estimate urgency?Quality & safety in health care · 2007Article
- Future of primary healthcare education: current problems and potential solutions.Postgraduate medical journal · 2003Review
- The effect of GP telephone triage on numbers seeking same-day appointments.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- Outreach clinics in the new NHS: not yet the end of outpatients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo undertake an economic evaluation of nurse telephone consultation using decision support software in comparison with usual general practice care provided by a general practice cooperative.
designCost analysis from an NHS perspective using stochastic data from a randomised controlled trial.
settingGeneral practice cooperative with 55 general practitioners serving 97 000 registered patients in Wiltshire, England. SUBJECTS: All patients contacting the service, or about whom the service was contacted during the trial year (January 1997 to January 1998).
main outcome measuresCosts and savings to the NHS during the trial year.
resultsThe cost of providing nurse telephone consultation was 81 237 pound sterling per annum. This, however, determined a 94 422 pound sterling reduction of other costs for the NHS arising from reduced emergency admissions to hospital. Using point estimates for savings, the cost analysis, combined with the analysis of outcomes, showed a dominance situation for the intervention over general practice cooperative care alone. If a larger improvement in outcomes is assumed (upper 95% confidence limit) NHS savings increase to 123 824 pound sterling per annum. Savings of only 3728 pound sterling would, however, arise in a scenario where lower 95% confidence limits for outcome differences were observed. To break even, the intervention would have needed to save 138 emergency hospital admissions per year, around 90% of the effect achieved in the trial. Additional savings of 16 928 pound sterling for general practice arose from reduced travel to visit patients at home and fewer surgery appointments within three days of a call.
conclusionsNurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care may reduce NHS costs in the long term by reducing demand for emergency admission to hospital. General practitioners currently bear most of the cost of nurse telephone consultation and benefit least from the savings associated with it. This indicates that the service produces benefits in terms of service quality, which are beyond the reach of this cost analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.