ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis1999
Co-inoculation of human and murine carcinoma cells induces reciprocal suppression of metastasis by both cell lines.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and characterization of OS 99-1, a cell line derived from a highly aggressive primary human osteosarcoma.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. AnimalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The interactions of two cell lines having different metastatic properties, and the subsequent effects on dissemination were investigated using the chicken embryo metastasis assay. The highly aggressive human epidermoid cell line HEp-3 was tested alone or mixed with the mouse colon carcinoma cell line CL26 in this assay. When inoculated individually, each cell line forms experimental metastases in the chicken embryo, but only the HEp-3 cells give rise to spontaneous metastases. In embryos co-inoculated with both cell lines there was an overall reduction in metastatic burden in both the spontaneous and experimental metastasis assays. Furthers studies revealed that CL26 cells, when co-inoculated with HEp-3 cells did not acquire the ability to spontaneously metastasize. However, in the presence of CL26 cells, spontaneous HEp-3 metastasis was reduced. Intravenous co-inoculation of HEp-3 and CL26 cells also resulted in a reciprocal suppression of experimental metastasis by both cell lines. These studies demonstrate that the interactions of adjacent, phenotypically different tumor cells can have a suppressive effect on dissemination of one or both cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.