Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10760239›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2000

Structural requirements for ligand binding by a probable plant vacuolar sorting receptor.

X Cao, S W Rogers, J Butler, L Beevers, J C Rogers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Structural insights into how vacuolar sorting receptors recognize the sorting determinants of seed storage proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. MTV proteins unveil ER- and microtubule-associated compartments in the plant vacuolar trafficking pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Structural basis for Ca2+-independence and activation by homodimerization of tomato subtilase 3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Wall associated kinases from plants - an overview.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2008
    Article
  19. The secretory system of Arabidopsis.The arabidopsis book · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

X CaoInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6340, USA.
S W Rogers
J Butler
L Beevers
J C Rogers
Washington State University · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How sorting receptors recognize amino acid determinants on polypeptide ligands and respond to pH changes for ligand binding or release is unknown. The plant vacuolar sorting receptor BP-80 binds polypeptide ligands with a central Asn-Pro-Ile-Arg (NPIR) motif. tBP-80, a soluble form of the receptor lacking transmembrane and cytoplasmic sequences, binds the peptide SSSFADSNPIRPVTDRAASTYC as a monomer with a specificity indistinguishable from that of BP-80. tBP-80 contains an N-terminal region homologous to ReMembR-H2 (RMR) protein lumenal domains, a unique central region, and three C-terminal epidermal growth factor (EGF) repeats. By protease digestion of purified secreted tBP-80, and from ligand binding studies with a secreted protein lacking the EGF repeats, we defined three protease-resistant structural domains: an N-terminal/RMR homology domain connected to a central domain, which together determine the NPIR-specific ligand binding site, and a C-terminal EGF repeat domain that alters the conformation of the other two domains to enhance ligand binding. A fragment representing the central domain plus the C-terminal domain could bind ligand but was not specific for NPIR. These results indicate that two tBP-80 binding sites recognize two separate ligand determinants: a non-NPIR site defined by the central domain-EGF repeat domain structure and an NPIR-specific site contributed by the interaction of the N-terminal/RMR homology domain and the central domain.

Indexed as

Plant ProteinsVesicular Transport ProteinsAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBinding SitesCell LineCysteine EndopeptidasesDisulfidesDrosophila melanogasterEndopeptidasesEnzyme PrecursorsEpidermal Growth FactorFluorescent DyesLigandsAntibodies, MonoclonalCysteine EndopeptidasesDisulfidesEndopeptidasesEnzyme PrecursorsEpidermal Growth FactorFluorescent DyesLigandsPeptide FragmentsPlant ProteinsproaleurainReceptors, Cell SurfaceVesicular Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10760239
PMCPMC139848
OpenAlexW2123636263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.