Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10759407›Full record

ReviewInvestigational new drugs1999

Toward checkmate: biology and breast cancer therapy for the new millennium.

K D Miller, G W Sledge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Investigational new drugs, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obesity and HER 2 overexpression: a common factor for poor prognosis of breast cancer.International seminars in surgical oncology : ISSO · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K D MillerDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
G W Sledge
Indiana University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A better understanding of the biology of breast cancer should lead to the rational development of new treatments and the ability to customize therapy for individual patients. Though promising in theory, translating advances in biological knowledge to the clinic has been difficult. Recently several areas of research have produced treatments which have entered clinical trials: three will be reviewed here. The growth of breast cancer is regulated by growth factors and their receptors; amplification or overexpression is associated with poor prognosis. As such inhibition of growth factors and/or growth factor receptors may provide an ideal therapeutic target. Herceptin binds to c-erbB-2, a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Significant responses were seen in patients with c-erbB-2 overexpressing breast cancer with Herceptin administered as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy. Herceptin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in late 1998. Breast cancer invasion and metastasis requires degradation of the surrounding basement membrane by matrix metalloproteinases and other proteolytic enzymes. Synthetic inhibitors of these enzymes are now in clinical trials. Breast cancers must stimulate angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels, in order to grow beyond a few millimeters in diameter. This nascent vascular network provides another opportunity for therapy. Preclinical models support the critical role of angiogenesis and the therapeutic benefit of angiogenesis inhibition; clinical trials are underway.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsGrowth SubstancesHumansReceptors, Growth FactorGrowth SubstancesReceptors, Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID10759407
OpenAlexW126674656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.