Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10757025›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2000

Development of synthetic promoters for radiation-mediated gene therapy.

B Marples, S D Scott, J H Hendry, M J Embleton, L S Lashford, G P Margison

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Influential Factors and Synergies for Radiation-Gene Therapy on Cancer.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2015
    Review
  5. Developments in the tools and methodologies of synthetic biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2014
    Review
  6. Article
  7. HSV Recombinant Vectors for Gene Therapy.The open virology journal · 2010
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Suppression of cancer growth by nonviral gene therapy based on a novel reactive oxygen species-responsive promoter.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current status of tumor radiogenic therapy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2005
    Review
  19. Inducible promoters for gene therapy of head and neck cancer: an in vitro study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2004
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B MarplesCancer Research Campaign Section of Genome Damage and Repair, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Manchester, UK.
S D Scott
J H Hendry
M J Embleton
L S Lashford
G P Margison
Cancer Research UK · GBCancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure of cells to ionising radiation results in the activation of specific transcriptional control (CArG) elements within the early growth response 1 (Egr1) gene promoter, leading to increased gene expression. As part of a study investigating the potential use of these elements in radiation-controlled gene therapy vectors, we have incorporated their sequences into a synthetic gene promoter and assayed for the ability to induce expression of a downstream reporter gene following irradiation. In vector-transfected MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells, the synthetic promoter was more effective than the wild-type Egr1 counterpart in up-regulating expression of the reporter gene after exposure to a single 5 Gy dose, and equally effective as the wild-type in U87-MG glioma cells. The level of gene expression achieved using the synthetic promoter was dependent on the inducing radiation dose for both U87-MG and MCF-7 cells, being maximal at 3 Gy and decreasing at 5 and 10 Gy. Furthermore, induction could be repeated by additional radiation treatments. The latter indicates that up-regulation should be additive during fractionated radiotherapy schedules. To demonstrate the potential clinical benefit of such an approach, the synthetic promoters were also shown to drive expression of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene, leading to enhanced cell killing in the presence of the prodrug ganciclovir (GCV) when compared with cells treated with radiation alone. Our results demonstrate that the synthetic promoter is responsive to low doses of ionising radiation and therefore isolated CArG elements function as radiation-mediated transcriptional enhancers outside their normal sequence context. The continued development and optimisation of such radiation-responsive synthetic promoters is expected to make a valuable contribution to the development of future radiation-responsive vectors for cancer gene therapy.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsAdenocarcinomaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGanciclovirGenetic TherapyGlioblastomaHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticSimplexvirusThymidine KinaseTranscription, GeneticTumor Cells, CulturedGanciclovirRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsThymidine Kinase

Identifiers

PMID10757025
OpenAlexW2082392586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.