ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1999
Management of deliberate self harm in general practice: a qualitative study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of the GP in the management of patients with self-harm behaviour: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Pooled it
- Examining drivers of self-harm guideline implementation by general practitioners: A qualitative analysis using the theoretical domains framework.British journal of health psychology · 2022Article
- Working with Young People at Risk of Suicidal Behaviour and Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study of Australian General Practitioners' Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt has been estimated that the incidence of deliberate self harm (DSH) is at least 10 times that of suicide. Accident and emergency discharge figures also point to an almost doubling of reported cases of DSH in the early 1990s.
aimTo assess general practitioners' (GPs') views on, and educational requirements for, managing patients following an episode of DSH.
methodA qualitative study with 14 GPs (seven male and seven female) from two outer-London boroughs, selected in order to provide a maximum variety sample. Interviews took place between February and April 1997, and data were analyzed using the principles of grounded theory.
resultsMost GPs felt that all patients presenting with DSH should be assessed by a psychiatrist. They expressed a preference for working with a community psychiatric nurse rather than a counsellor. Suggestions to improve their working relationship with community mental health teams included provision of one centralized point of referral and ease of access to the service in times of crisis. GPs were sceptical of guidelines, emphasizing that they needed joint ownership in writing them, but most importantly that they needed adequate resources to implement them. Specific changes to postgraduate education were suggested, such as individual educational portfolios.
conclusionImproved working relationships between GPs and community mental health teams are needed in order to provide a more efficient and effective service for patients. Lifelong learning needs to be adapted in a style and approach to suit GPs' individual requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10756614PMC1313500W6710095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.