Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10756610›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1999

A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners.

E F Kaner, C A Lock, B R McAvoy, N Heather, E Gilvarry

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Accuracy of one or two simple questions to identify alcohol-use disorder in primary care: a meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Changes in receptionists' attitudes towards involvement in a general practice-based trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Trial
  16. A randomized trial of three marketing strategies to disseminate a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme to general practitioners.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999
    Trial
  17. Effect of Community Support on the Implementation of Primary Health Care-Based Measurement of Alcohol Consumption.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E F KanerDepartment of Primary Health Care, School of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
C A Lock
B R McAvoy
N Heather
E Gilvarry
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding doctors with new research findings or clinical guidelines is rarely sufficient to promote changes in clinical practice. An implementation strategy is required to provide clinicians with the skills and encouragement needed to alter established routines.

aimTo evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different training and support strategies in promoting implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention (SBI) by general practitioners (GPs).

methodSubjects were 128 GPs, one per practice, from the former Northern and Yorkshire Regional Health Authority, who agreed to use the 'Drink-Less' SBI programme in an earlier dissemination trial. GPs were stratified by previous marketing conditions and randomly allocated to three intensities of training and support: controls (n = 43) received the programme with written guidelines only, trained GPs (n = 43) received the programme plus practice-based training in programme usage, trained and supported GPs (n = 42) received the programme plus practice-based training and a support telephone call every two weeks. GPs were requested to use the programme for three months. Outcome measures included proportions of GPs implementing the programme and numbers of patients screened and intervened with.

resultsSeventy-three (57%) GPs implemented the programme and screened 11,007 patients for risk drinking. Trained and supported GPs were significantly more likely to implement the programme (71%) than controls (44%) or trained GPs (56%); they also screened, and intervened with, significantly more patients. Costs per patient screened were: trained and supported GPs, 1.05 Pounds; trained GPs, 1.08 Pounds; and controls, 1.47 Pounds. Costs per patient intervened with were: trained and supported GPs, 5.43 Pounds; trained GPs, 6.02 Pounds; and controls, 8.19 Pounds.

conclusionPractice-based training plus support telephone calls was the most effective and cost-effective strategy to encourage implementation of SBI by GPs.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingAlcohol DrinkingAttitude of Health PersonnelCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFamily PracticeHumansMarketing of Health ServicesMass ScreeningPhysicians, FamilyProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID10756610
PMCPMC1313496
OpenAlexW2117772521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.