Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10756007›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2000

Roles of adeno-associated virus Rep protein and human chromosome 19 in site-specific recombination.

S M Young, D M McCarty, N Degtyareva, R J Samulski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Inducible HEK293 AAV packaging cell lines expressing Rep proteins.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Genome Engineering Using Adeno-associated Virus: Basic and Clinical Research Applications.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

S M YoungCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
D M McCarty
N Degtyareva
R J Samulski
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

HOMOLOOUS RECOMBINATION: ITS MOLECULAR CYTOLOGYR01GM031819 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GRIFFITH, JACK D · 1985 to 2017
$5.2M
RAAV TRANSDUCTION IN HUMAN HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLR01HL048347 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SAMULSKI, RICHARD J · 1992 to 2000
$227k
HYBRID PLASMID-AAV VECTORS FOR CFTR GENE THERAPYR01DK051880 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SAMULSKI, RICHARD J · 1997 to 2000
$197k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL048347NIDDK NIH HHS DK51880NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031819PHS HHS 2T32A107419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is the only known eucaryotic virus capable of targeted integration in human cells. AAV integrates preferentially into human chromosome (ch) 19q13.3qter. The nonstructural proteins of AAV-2, Rep78 and Rep68, are essential for targeted integration. Rep78 and Rep68 are multifunctional proteins with diverse biochemical activities, including site-specific binding to AAV and ch-19 target sequences, helicase activity, and strand-specific, site-specific endonuclease activities. Both a Rep DNA binding element (RBE) and a nicking site essential for AAV replication present within the viral terminal repeats are also located on ch-19. Recently, identical RBE sequences have been identified at other locations in the human genome. This fact raises numerous questions concerning AAV targeted integration; specifically, how many RBE sequences are in the human genome? How does Rep discriminate between these and the ch-19 RBE sequence? Does Rep interact with all sites and, if so, how is targeted integration within a fixed time frame facilitated? To better characterize the role of Rep in targeted integration, we established a Rep-dependent filter DNA binding assay using a highly purified Rep-68 fusion protein. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis was also performed to determine the characteristics of the Rep-RBE interaction. Our results determined that the Rep affinity for ch-19 is not distinct compared to other RBEs in the human genome when utilizing naked DNA. In fact, a minimum-binding site (GAGYGAGC) efficiently associated with Rep, suggesting that as many as 2 x 10(5) sites may exist. In addition, such sites also exist frequently in nonprimate mammalian genomes, although AAV integrates site specifically into primate genomes. EM analysis demonstrated that only one Rep-DNA complex was formed on ch-19 target DNA. Surprisingly, identically sized complexes were observed on all substrates containing a RBE sequence, but never on DNA lacking an RBE. Rep-DNA complexes involved a multimeric protein structure that spanned ca. 60 bp. Immunoprecipitation of AAV latently infected cells determined that 1,000 to 4,000 copies of Rep78 and Rep68 protein are expressed per cell. Comparison of the Rep association constant with those of established DNA binding proteins indicates that sufficient molecules of Rep are present to interact with all potential RBE sites. Moreover, Rep expression in the absence of AAV cis-acting substrate resulted in Rep-dependent amplification and rearrangement of the target sequence in ch-19. This result suggests that this locus is a hot spot for Rep-dependent recombination. Finally, we engineered mice to carry a single 2.7-kb human ch-19 insertion containing the AAV ch-19 target locus. Using cells derived from these mice, we demonstrated that this sequence was sufficient for site-specific recombination after infection with transducing vectors expressing Rep. This result indicates that any host factors required for targeting are conserved between human and mouse. Furthermore, the human ch-19 cis sequences and chromatin structure required for site-specific recombination are contained within this fragment. Overall, these results indicate that the specificity of targeted recombination to human ch-19 is not dictated by differential Rep affinities for RBE sites. Instead, specificity is likely dictated by human ch-19 sequences that serve as a Rep protein-mediated origin of replication, thus facilitating viral targeting through Rep-Rep interactions and host enzymes, resulting in site-specific recombination. Control of specificity is clearly dictated by the ch-19 sequences, since transfer of these sequences into the mouse genome are sufficient to achieve Rep-dependent site-specific integration.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19Recombination, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesDependovirusDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesHeLa CellsHumansMiceRabbitsViral ProteinsX ChromosomeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Helicasesrep proteins, Adeno-associated virus 2Viral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10756007
PMCPMC111909
OpenAlexW2050532629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.