Trial reportPharmaceutical research2000
Comparison of zafirlukast (Accolate) absorption after oral and colonic administration in humans.
Trial report in Pharmaceutical research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of Zafirlukast Analogues for Improved Antithrombotic Activity Through Thiol Isomerase Inhibition.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025Article
- Targeting thiol isomerase activity with zafirlukast to treat ovarian cancer from the bench to clinic.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023Article
- ATP-releasing SWELL1 channel in spinal microglia contributes to neuropathic pain.Science advances · 2023Article
- Zafirlukast is a broad-spectrum thiol isomerase inhibitor that inhibits thrombosis without altering bleeding times.British journal of pharmacology · 2021Article
- A simple one-pot 2-stepTetrahedron letters · 2013Article
- Pharmacokinetic profile of zafirlukast.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study characterized the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of zafirlukast after oral and colonic administration in humans.
methodsFive healthy subjects received zafirlukast solution (40 mg) orally and via an oroenteric tube into the colon in a randomized, crossover fashion. Two additional subjects were dosed into the distal ileum. Serial blood samples were obtained and plasma concentrations were quantitated by HPLC.
resultsMean +/- SD pharmacokinetic parameters after oral vs. colonic administration were: AUC infinity of 2076 +/- 548 vs. 602 +/- 373 ng x h/mL, respectively, and Cmax of 697 +/- 314 vs. 194 +/- 316 ng/mL, respectively. Mean colon:oral AUCalpha and Cmax were 0.29 and 0.30, respectively. Median tmax values were 2.0 and 1.35 hr after oral and colonic administration. First-order absorption rate constants (Ka and Kac) were estimated from a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Kac:Ka was <0.5 in 4 of the 5 subjects dosed in the colon.
conclusionsZafirlukast was absorbed at multiple sites in the GI tract. The rate and extent of zafirlukast absorption was less after colonic than oral administration. Zafirlukast was significantly absorbed in the distal ileum. This study demonstrated that gamma scintigraphy, digital radiography, and fluoroscopy can be used to track the movement and confirm the location of the oroenteric tube in the GI tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.