Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10750214›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2000

Nebulised steroid in the treatment of croup: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

S Griffin, S Ellis, A Fitzgerald-Barron, J Rose, M Egger

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glucocorticoids for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Glucocorticoids for croup in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Croup in children.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Review
  9. Croup.Lancet (London, England) · 2008
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Historical review of croup.Paediatrics & child health · 2001
    Article
  12. Historical review of croup.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses · 2001
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S GriffinDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge. sjg49@medschl.cam.ac.uk
S Ellis
A Fitzgerald-Barron
J Rose
M Egger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCroup is one of the commonest respiratory complaints among children. There is growing evidence that steroids may be an effective treatment.

aimTo assess the effectiveness of treatment with nebulised steroid for children with croup.

methodSystematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing administration of nebulised steroid with placebo. Trials were identified from searches of three bibliographic databases, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, correspondence with the manufacturers of nebulised steroid, and one round of manual citation searching.

resultsEight randomised controlled trials were identified including 574 children with mild to severe croup. Overall, the mean age was 25.2 months and 72% of children were male. All trials were hospital-based and of good methodological quality, with adequate concealment of treatment allocation and blind outcome assessment. Children treated with nebulised steroid were significantly more likely to show an improvement in croup score by five hours (combined relative risk = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 1.74) and significantly less likely to need hospital admission after attending the emergency department (combined relative risk = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.42 to 0.75) than the placebo group. The funnel plot indicated the presence of publication bias, with smaller studies showing the larger effects, but this could also be owing to less pronounced effects in studies of older children with milder croup.

conclusionsNebulised steroids are effective in the treatment of children attending hospital departments with croup. A meta-analysis based on individual patient data could clarify to what extent the effect depends on age and severity of disease. New trials are needed to define the indications for, and effectiveness of, steroid treatment of croup in the community.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBudesonideChildChild, PreschoolCroupFemaleHumansInfantMaleNebulizers and VaporizersPlacebosRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBudesonidePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID10750214
PMCPMC1313634
OpenAlexW1867544219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.