ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2000
Primary care groups and research networks: opportunities for R&D in context.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision making process and factors contributing to research participation among general practitioners: A grounded theory study.PloS one · 2018Article
- Public health research implementation and translation: evidence from practice-based research networks.American journal of preventive medicine · 2013Article
- Expanding delivery system research in public health settings: lessons from practice-based research networks.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP · 2012Article
- [Theme networks in cooperative research].Atencion primaria · 2003Article
- Networks for research in primary health care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
- Primary care research networks: an evolving model meriting national evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10750202PMC1313622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.