Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10748241›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2000

Differentiating between memory and effector CD8 T cells by altered expression of cell surface O-glycans.

L E Harrington, M Galvan, L G Baum, J D Altman, R Ahmed

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Runx3 Regulates CD8International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. GCNT1-MediatedJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2020
    Article
  11. A functional subset of CD8Nature communications · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role of Inactive and ActiveFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Endogenous tumor-reactive CD8Oncoimmunology · 2013
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L E HarringtonEmory Vaccine Center and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
M Galvan
L G Baum
J D Altman
R Ahmed
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Tumor Immunology Training ProgramT32CA009120 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Steven M. Dubinett, MICHAEL A TEITELL · 1985 to 2026
$10.3M
T CELL MEMORY TO VIRUSESR01AI030048 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AHMED, RAFI · 1990 to 2022
$5.2M
T CELL MEMORY TO VIRUSESR37AI030048 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI · 2001 to 2010
$3.9M
VIRAL PERSISTENCE: GENETIC &IMMUNOLOGICAL STUDIESR01NS021496 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AHMED, RAFI · 1985 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA09120-21NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009120NIAID NIH HHS AI30048NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030048NINDS NIH HHS NS21496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently there are few reliable cell surface markers that can clearly discriminate effector from memory T cells. To determine if there are changes in O-glycosylation between these two cell types, we analyzed virus-specific CD8 T cells at various time points after lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection of mice. Antigen-specific CD8 T cells were identified using major histocompatibility complex class I tetramers, and glycosylation changes were monitored with a monoclonal antibody (1B11) that recognizes O-glycans on mucin-type glycoproteins. We observed a striking upregulation of a specific cell surface O-glycan epitope on virus-specific CD8 T cells during the effector phase of the primary cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. This upregulation showed a strong correlation with the acquisition of effector function and was downregulated on memory CD8 T cells. Upon reinfection, there was again increased expression of this specific O-glycan epitope on secondary CTL effectors, followed once more by decreased expression on memory cells. Thus, this study identifies a new cell surface marker to distinguish between effector and memory CD8 T cells. This marker can be used to isolate pure populations of effector CTLs and also to determine the proportion of memory CD8 T cells that are recruited into the secondary response upon reencounter with antigen. This latter information will be of value in optimizing immunization strategies for boosting CD8 T cell responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmunologic MemoryKineticsLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicPolysaccharidesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryEpitopes, T-LymphocytePolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID10748241
PMCPMC2193165
OpenAlexW2107545472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.